On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 23:56:41 +0100, Ken Moffat
wrote:
> Actually, this is the first problem I saw, but I've waited until the final
> toolchain was completed before I mention it.
>
> On x86_64, with glibc-2.12.1 and otherwise the 20100803 book, in
> pass 2 glibc the build failed in libgomp with
>
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS Version 6.7-rc1. This release includes numerous changes to LFS-6.6
(including updates to Linux-2.6.35.4, GCC-4.5.1, Glibc-2.12.1) and
security fixes. It also includes editorial work on the explanatory
material throughout the
On 1 September 2010 14:41, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> I lied before [0] and I do see this. Why are we using 'LD_LIBRARY_PATH'
> instead
> of --disable-libgomp in pass2 as we do in pass 1? (yes, I'm well aware that
> it was
> me that committed r9254 that added this as part of the upgrade to GCC-4
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 20:24:19 +0100, Ken Moffat
wrote:
> On 1 September 2010 14:41, Matthew Burgess
> wrote:
>
>> I lied before [0] and I do see this. Why are we using
> 'LD_LIBRARY_PATH' instead
>> of --disable-libgomp in pass2 as we do in pass 1? (yes, I'm well aware
> that it was
>> me that c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
It's been quite a while since I've posted, but I _have_ been busy
building LFS 6.6 with package users, albeit slowly.
I promised to post some build notes, so here they are (so far).
Quick background: I'm building LFS 6.6 on a Slackware 13.1
