Moving this here from trac. When I put the ABI=32 note in, I
screwed up. But it's only 2 weeks ago that anyone noticed.
In the meantime, building for x86_64 is now supported by LFS, so
the current note could also be misinterpreted.
There is a second issue on the ticket - if I've understood corr
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Moving this here from trac. When I put the ABI=32 note in, I
> screwed up. But it's only 2 weeks ago that anyone noticed.
>
> In the meantime, building for x86_64 is now supported by LFS, so
> the current note could also be misinterpreted.
>
> There is a second issue on the
On 9 May 2010 18:00, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> The substance looks pretty good. How about some minor changes:
>
> If you are building with a 32-bit kernel, but you have a CPU which is
> capable of running 64-bit code *and* you have specified CFLAGS in the
> environment, the configure script will at
On May 3, 2010, at 9:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I have never liked cgi. I'd much rather see a php version. It looks
> like one was started a few years ago, but never finished.
>
> Volunteers?
Well, since no one else volunteered, I'll see if I can fit this in.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscrat
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: gmp note (#2648)
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Moving this here from trac. When I put the ABI=32 note in, I
> > screwed up. But it's only 2 weeks ago that anyone notic
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Moffat"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 6:37 PM
Subject: gmp note (#2648)
> Moving this here from trac. When I put the ABI=32 note in, I
> screwed up. But it's only 2 weeks ago that anyone noticed.
>
> In the meantime, building for x86_64 is now suppor
On 9 May 2010 18:58, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> Just tested on AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+, 32bits distrib, with only
> ./configure --build=i486-linux
>
> this result in
> ...
> checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
> using ABI="32"
> CC="gcc -std=gnu99"
>
>
> CFLAGS="-m32 -O2 -pedantic
Ken Moffat wrote:
> First "*and*" - it's emphasised. Are you are using recent kde ?
> Gtk-webkit doesn't do emphasis (looking at epiphany-2.28), gecko does
> (italics in forefox-3.6.3plugin), lynx does (different colour). So, I'm
> reluctant to add '*' for emphasis in the text.
No, that's just
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Moffat"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: gmp note (#2648)
> >
>
> For x86_64-capable CPUs (pedantically, I don't think this is an issue on
> other 64-bit-capable architectures) I see no benefit in specif
