Hi Gerard,
> Patch came through properly the first time around, at least on my end.
In fact, I don't receive the mail I send to the mailing list and the list
archive seems to remove non-text (i.e non dot txt??) attachments, so I just
wanted to be sure.
> I have added the patch to the correspondi
On Sunday 24 May 2009 21:09:35 Trent Shea wrote:
> make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-mutex5.out] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-mutex9.out] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-mutex5a.out] Error 1
Alright, I believe that these errors are triggered
Trent Shea wrote:
> On Sunday 24 May 2009 21:09:35 Trent Shea wrote:
>> make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-mutex5.out] Error 1
>> make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-mutex9.out] Error 1
>> make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-mutex5a.out] Error 1
>
> Alright, I believe that
On Sunday 24 May 2009 21:09:35 Trent Shea wrote:
> make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-mutex5.out] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-mutex9.out] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-mutex5a.out] Error 1
Alright, I believe that these errors are triggered
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 12:13:09 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> That's interesting. I don't see those errors, but perhaps that's because
> I'm building on an LFS-6.4 system with a 2.6.27.4 kernel.
The errors were only triggered by having the 'bad' kernel version running.
> > Another note regarding the 2.
Trent Shea wrote:
> I've had these kind of messages for some time. They can also be viewed on
> ubuntu by unpacking the kernel source and running make headers_check on
> versions later than 2.6.28.10. It's possible these messages were added to
> help
> kernel developers, but I haven't had a ch
Hiya,
Next time somebody arrives at Chapter 5 - GCC Pass 2, can you deviate
slightly from the book and try out the change mentioned in Ticket #2413
at http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2413
I just deleted my Chapter 5 so I was wondering if one of you guys is
already in the process of
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 13:30:32 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0812.3/01339.html
Thanks for the link.
> I went ahead and got linux-2.6.30-rc7 (2.6.29 + patch) and make
> headers_check only gives:
> So it looks like they are working on it.
Yea, I've noticed t
Hi,
Currently http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/development/
refreshes once a day.
Seeing it only takes about 1.5 to 2 minutes to generate those files,
there isn't any problem updating those files more frequently. Once an
hour seems reasonable.
On the other hand, it'd be a waste o
On Wednesday 27 May 2009 18:42:37 Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> Next time somebody arrives at Chapter 5 - GCC Pass 2, can you deviate
> slightly from the book and try out the change mentioned in Ticket #2413
> at http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2413
>
> I just deleted my Chapter 5
Trent,
> for file in gcc/config/linux64.h gcc/config/linux.h gcc/config/sysv4.h;
>
Right, I totally forgot about the other architecture subdirectories.
I briefly considered just now modifying that to "for file in
gcc/config/*/file.h" but then it won't match files in the gcc/config
director
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/development/
> refreshes once a day.
>
> Seeing it only takes about 1.5 to 2 minutes to generate those files,
> there isn't any problem updating those files more frequently. Once an
> hour seems reasonable
> Changes more than once a day may be confusing. The book is now identified by
> a
> date. If there are different versions with the same date, it could cause a
> new
> user a problem.
>
> Developers, on the other hand, build in their own sandbox and don't need the
> site to do it.
>
> I'd r
13 matches
Mail list logo
