Re: vimrc recommendation

2009-04-01 Thread Martin Ward
Spencer Collyer wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:40:30 -0600, Archaic wrote: > >> The vimrc that LFS creates is very spartan. There is a default >> configuration that isn't bad plus it gives new users a quick idea of >> how powerful the rc can be. >> >> cp runtime/vimrc_example.vim /etc/vimrc >>

Re: vimrc recommendation

2009-04-01 Thread Martin Ward
Martin Ward wrote: > Spencer Collyer wrote: > >> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:40:30 -0600, Archaic wrote: >> >> >>> The vimrc that LFS creates is very spartan. There is a default >>> configuration that isn't bad plus it gives new users a quick idea of >>> how powerful the rc can be. >>> >>> cp

Re: vimrc recommendation

2009-04-01 Thread Archaic
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 07:19:42AM +0100, Spencer Collyer wrote: > > The general recommendation on the VIm lists is to source > runtime/vimrc_example.vim in your own vimrc. That way, if you upgrade > VIm at a later time and the vimrc_example.vim changes to handle new > features, you automatically

Re: vimrc recommendation

2009-04-01 Thread Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas
On Wed, Apr 01, at 07:19 Spencer Collyer wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:40:30 -0600, Archaic wrote: > > The vimrc that LFS creates is very spartan. There is a default > > configuration that isn't bad plus it gives new users a quick idea of > > how powerful the rc can be. > > > > cp runtime/vimrc_

Re: man-pages has a home page now

2009-04-01 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:21:23 -0600, Archaic wrote: > +http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/";> > > I was hoping to use &kernel;, but that has /pub/ at the end. Oh well. :) Thanks, Archaic. Committed in r8851. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http:

Re: vimrc recommendation

2009-04-01 Thread Archaic
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:22:47PM +0300, Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas wrote: > > Actually Tony answered me, that the most > sane solution is to source mswin.vim which offers a more nice environment. Was he referring to vim on linux or vim on windows? -- Archaic -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/m

Re: vimrc recommendation

2009-04-01 Thread Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas
On Wed, Apr 01, at 04:50 Archaic wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 09:22:47PM +0300, Agathoklis D. Hatzimanikas wrote: > > > > Actually Tony answered me, that the most > > sane solution is to source mswin.vim which offers a more nice environment. > > Was he referring to vim on linux or vim on wind