Hi all,
I get this in my latest build logs, when trying to compile inetutils-1.6
against readline.6.0:
mv -f .deps/ruserpass.Tpo .deps/ruserpass.Po
gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -o ftp cmds.o cmdtab.o domacro.o ftp.o main.o
ruserpass.o -L../libinetutils -linetutils -L../lib -lgnu -lreadline -lcurse
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 3:46:58 -0700, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I get this in my latest build logs, when trying to compile inetutils-1.6
> against readline.6.0:
>
> mv -f .deps/ruserpass.Tpo .deps/ruserpass.Po
> gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -o ftp cmds.o cmdtab.o domacro.o ftp.o main.o
> ru
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 02/28/09 17:00 CST:
> Just to let you know that trying to build libusb-compat early on
> in a BLFS build fails (hard fail in ./configure) if pkg-config
> isn't installed.
I'll fix this right now. This situation with pkg-config is just
going to get worse and wor
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/28/09 19:33 CST:
> While I'm not completely against putting pkg-config in LFS, we could also put
> it
> into Chapter 3 of BLFS, 'After LFS Configuration Issues'.
It wouldn't surprise me if some LFS package looks for pkg-config in the
near future. At that time,
Hi all,
"Notes on Building Software" in BLFS recommends, quite rightly,
that readers should do as little as possible as 'root', and only
use superuser privs for operations that require them (e.g.
'make install').
And, as this is *LFS I have chosen to ignore that advice up
until now and keep all t
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:05:41 -0600, Randy McMurchy
wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/28/09 19:33 CST:
>> While I'm not completely against putting pkg-config in LFS, we could
> also put it
>> into Chapter 3 of BLFS, 'After LFS Configuration Issues'.
>
> It wouldn't surprise me if some
