2008/3/17, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What about Grub2? The time must be getting near.. Anyone use it?
I was able to make it work in QEMU in the "new ext3 on LVM2 on
/dev/hda1, no /boot partition" case. But the lack of up-to-date
documentation in the tarball and incompleteness of the docu
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Hello,
as explained in http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2161 (a blocker),
due to recent changes in e2fsprogs, Grub-0.97 no longer works (cannot read any
files from the resulting filesystem, cannot be installed into MBR, and the book
is thus horribly bro
>> > > Did anyone investigate the boot loader options further? What should be
>>
> > done for
>
>> > > LFS-7.0?
>>
> >
> > What about Grub2? The time must be getting near.. Anyone use it?
>
>> Version 1.95 was not installable at all if root is on LVM2 (even if
>> /boot is on a pl
Sebastian Faulborn wrote:
> How do you mean - "not installable at all if root is on LVM2"? I have been
> using LVM2 on root together with grub for the last 2 years without problems...
That was about Grub2. Grub legacy, with a separate /boot partition, works fine.
And I mean that the command "grub
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 4:46 AM
Subject: Choosing a boot loader for LFS 7.0
> Hello,
>
> as explained in http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2161 (a
blocker),
> due to r
