Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> Thomas Pegg wrote:
>> From what I remember it was so we could mount /dev/pts and /dev/shm
>> inside of the chroot, but that's unnecessary now with the bind mount
>> of the host's /dev.
>
> The bind-mount of /dev isn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Thomas Pegg wrote:
> Actually were using the host's mount at that point unless your adding
> /tools/bin to the root user path (which is not in the book I might add),
Oh, I forgot that part runs as root. I was thinking it was still the
lfs user f
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Thomas Pegg wrote:
>> since su'ing to root even from the lfs user the path does not carry
>> over, /tools/bin is lost.
>
> It will carry over unless your shell login scripts explicitly reset it.
Umm, not necessarily. It depends if the `su' comes from Coreutils or
Shadow,
On Monday December 10 2007 12:42:29 pm Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I am back:)
Welcome back Tushar :-)
robert
pgpb2hzIPA9Wi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above informat
On Monday 10 December 2007, Greg Schafer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While we are talking about the evolution of LFS, now seems like a good
> time to announce to the wider LFS community the availability of a Next
> Generation build method.
Greg,
is there another mailing list where you discuss matters surrou
