Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I rolled a new snapshot that has a few changes since the last 20070420
> tarball. Please test it out so we can get any fixes in to 6.3. They
> should be entirely backwards compatible with existing scripts.
Hiya.
I maybe should know where to look, but I don't
Jens Stroebel wrote:
> I maybe should know where to look, but I don't...
> Where is the download location for the new LFS-bootscripts you rolled?
>
http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs-bootscripts-20070730.tar.bz2
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
- Forwarded message from Dale Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Dale Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: extra prompt.sh
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:15:40 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You know, when I got this version of LFS up for the first time, I
thought
On 7/26/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/26/07, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:17:52 -0700, "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > On 7/26/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> The 2.6.22 kernel (maybe 2.6.21
ent kernel. Bryan also added rules for DVBs and
extra floppy types. Please test this out as I've merged it into the
6.3 branch.
http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/udev-config-20070731.tar.bz2
Changes since the last snapshot (beware gmail formatting):
2007-07-31 Dan Nicholson &l
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 02:48:03PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I rolled a new snapshot that has a few changes since the last 20070420
> tarball. Please test it out so we can get any fixes in to 6.3. They
> should be entirely backwards compatible with existing scripts.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12
On 7/31/07, Jens Stroebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> as far as I can tell, everything boots flawlessly; there is one thing
> I did leave out because of local "deviation from the book": we took
> care to have our loglevel set here before that got into the
> lfs-bootscripts package, so I didn't c
El Martes, 31 de Julio de 2007 16:07, Dan Nicholson escribió:
>
> http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/udev-config-20070731.tar.bz2
>
I think that the book URLs to download both lfs-bootscripts and udev-config
should be changed to use http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org. It'
On 7/31/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Martes, 31 de Julio de 2007 16:07, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> >
> > http://downloads.linuxfromscratch.org/udev-config-20070731.tar.bz2
>
> I think that the book URLs to download both lfs-bootscripts and udev-config
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I would like to allow glibc-2.5.1 through a freeze if it happens. That
> should be safe since we've been moving the snapshot along.
New Glibc's are now up.
Regards
Greg
--
http://www.diy-linux.org/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.
On 7/31/07, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > I would like to allow glibc-2.5.1 through a freeze if it happens. That
> > should be safe since we've been moving the snapshot along.
>
> New Glibc's are now up.
Thanks, Greg. Was there no announcement?
--
Dan
--
ht
On 7/30/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/30/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I put out a 6.3-rc1 a week ago and there really has been very little
> > feedback. Is it ready for final release?
>
> Let me spin new tarballs for lfs-bootscripts and udev-config. I'll
> m
On 7/30/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tar is repeatedly failing '26: incremental' for me, looks like a
> regression. But nobody else has commented.
If you have any idea how to narrow this down, that'd be great. I have
hit this before myself, and it seems like a race condition, bu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 03:50:53PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/30/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Tar is repeatedly failing '26: incremental' for me, looks like a
> > regression. But nobody else has commented.
>
> If you have any idea how to narrow this down, that'd be g
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/30/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 7/30/07, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I put out a 6.3-rc1 a week ago and there really has been very little
>>> feedback. Is it ready for final release?
>> Let me spin new tarballs for lfs-bootscripts an
Original Message
Subject: List messages rejected
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. Sorry to trouble you. My messages to the list are being held and
rejected. The last one, my own copy below, was held
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For reference this is what installed with libedit.
>>
>> root:root 755 160628 /usr/lib/libedit.so.0.0.24
>> root:root 755 809 /usr/lib/libedit.la
>> root:root 644 181584 /usr/lib
On 7/31/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/31/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Right now in both 6.3-rc1 and 6.3 branch that URL are hardcoded in
> > packages.ent to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/development/,
> > that is not kosher.
>
> Possibly, b
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Yes, that sounds fine. Let me know when you think -rc2 should be released.
Just wanted to mention there is a 6.3-rc1 package tarball I generated a
couple days ago, will do one for rc2 as soon as it is out as well.
ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs/lfs-packages/lfs-packages-6.3
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 7/31/07, M.Canales.es <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Right now in both 6.3-rc1 and 6.3 branch that URL are hardcoded in
>>> packages.ent to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/downloads/development/,
>>> that is no
20 matches
Mail list logo
