On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:22:07PM -0400, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> But if you remove all your rules and reboot, udev will generate new
> rules for all your NICs, so Alexander's suggestion of removing them all
> is a good idea. Just beware that what you want isn't possible.
>
> (Why do you want it,
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Jens Stroebel wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:22:07PM -0400, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
> > (Why do you want it, by the way?)
>
> That's because we install a laptop with a pcmcia-plugged network card.
> Should someone at a later time change this card (e.g
On Monday 21 May 2007 16:08:02 Robert Connolly wrote:
> Changes to linux-2.6's printk, and possible other things, have broken
> klogd's EIP translation. There are no patches available to fix klogd.
Which in my mind just says it's time to switch to syslog-ng and dump plain old
syslog and klogd. I
On Tuesday May 22 2007 02:24:44 pm Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> On Monday 21 May 2007 16:08:02 Robert Connolly wrote:
> > Changes to linux-2.6's printk, and possible other things, have broken
> > klogd's EIP translation. There are no patches available to fix klogd.
>
> Which in my mind just says it's
Robert Connolly wrote:
> Syslog-ng was in the LFS book for a short time. It's terrible under load,
> servers can't use it.
Sorry - dsa.physics.usu.ru (an old Pentium-166) logs every SYN and FIN
packet going through its NAT with iptables and syslog-ng, and works just
fine for two full classroom
Robert Connolly wrote:
> Syslog-ng was in the LFS book for a short time. It's terrible under load,
> servers can't use it.
I haven't had problems with either packages myself, syslog-ng was
perfectly fine on my dedicateds. Actually at work, we have 2000 shared
hosting servers hosting 500,000 domai
Justin R. Knierim wrote:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
>> Syslog-ng was in the LFS book for a short time. It's terrible under load,
>> servers can't use it.
> I haven't had problems with either packages myself, syslog-ng was
> perfectly fine on my dedicateds. Actually at work, we have 2000 shared
> ho
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Just to add to this, anduin has been running with syslog-ng from the
> beginning and it has never had a problem.
Here's a relevant post:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2005-February/050643.html
But AFAICT the sysklogd maintainership hasn't really improved.. N
