Re: Fighting spam via greylisting

2007-04-14 Thread M.Canales.es
El Lunes, 9 de Abril de 2007 06:55, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: > > The issue was always with *outgoing* mail from mailman and a flooded > mail queue, not a delay of accepting *incoming* mail which would have > only happened once for each MTA. Looks like that issue is here again :-/ -- Manuel Can

Re: Fighting spam via greylisting

2007-04-14 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:11:34 +0200, "M.Canales.es" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like that issue is here again :-/ I'm busy this morning, but I'll try to look at it later today. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscr

Bison host requirement

2007-04-14 Thread Dan Nicholson
A couple people recently hit a bug building bash in Ch. 5 using the bison from their host. There's a bug from one reporter and a split up support thread from the other: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1977 http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/2007-April/032888.html They b

Re: Fighting spam via greylisting

2007-04-14 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 21:19:54 -0500, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Auto whitelist on greylist? Auto permanent whitelist would be bad, I'm > assuming this is just a retention policy? The general policy is accept if the MTA appears in the database has having tried to deliver before. But th

Re: Bison host requirement

2007-04-14 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Saturday 14 April 2007 17:54, Dan Nicholson wrote: > I confirmed now that things are broken with 1.75, but work with 1.875 > and 2.0. > > One question I have is, what's the deal with bison-1.875a? I don't > remember what the "a" version was about, and it's not on the GNU ftp > site. Is it su

Re: Fighting spam via greylisting

2007-04-14 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 6:51:34 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:11:34 +0200, "M.Canales.es" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Looks like that issue is here again :-/ > > I'm busy this morning, but I'll try to look at it later today. OK. It looks like this migh

Re: Fighting spam via greylisting

2007-04-14 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:37:06 -0600, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot > OK. It looks like this might be a recurring problem unless we can find the > source. When mailman tries to deliver a message to a user at a domain that > is (at least temporarily) unresolvable, everything else takes bac

Re: Bison host requirement

2007-04-14 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Dan Nicholson wrote: > A couple people recently hit a bug building bash in Ch. 5 using the > bison from their host. There's a bug from one reporter and a split up > support thread from the other: > > http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1977 > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-suppo