Hello,
I was trying to setup ifb0 device on pure
LFS (current development LFS) + iptables-1.3.5 (blfs).
After setting up command from IFB Linux webpage:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
tc filter add dev eth0 parent : protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
match u32 0 0 flowid 1:1 \
action ipt -j MAR
nofast wrote:
Hello,
I was trying to setup ifb0 device on pure
LFS (current development LFS) + iptables-1.3.5 (blfs).
After setting up command from IFB Linux webpage:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
tc filter add dev eth0 parent : protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
match u32 0 0 flowid 1:1 \
ac
>I submitted the addition for hlfs-dev. It should be added to gmane
>pending approval.
>robert
Thanks,
Please ping the list when it is ready.
Peter
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Sebastian wrote:
>I have already developed a pretty stable HLFS (ie. I have not found
>a bug yet...).
>Have a look at http://www.secure-slinux.org.
I looked at this when you announced it
(more than a year already?) and that
track record certainly bears a "Stable"
status IMHO.
I am also incline
Good afternoon blfs-dev mailing list members!
This is my first actual post here, but I've been reading for quite
some time. I've been using LFS since book 3 for some kind of
relativity (not that it should indicate anything, really).
Anyway, every now and then when I do a build I try out dhclien
Found the second on besides Dan's util-linux one. Vsftpd, caused by the
syscalls being removed from unistd.h, anyone got any ideas.
gcc -m64 -c sysdeputil.c -O2 -Wall -W -Wshadow -idirafter dummyinc
sysdeputil.c:162: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before
'capset'
sysdeputil.c:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Thanks for reporting the problem. It would also be nice if you could
> create a ticket so we don't forget this. This happens on the BLFS
> wiki, and you'd need an account to create a ticket.
>
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/
Sure, I can do that. I haven't really
