Just giving a heads up.
--
Nathan Coulson (conathan)
--
nathan at linuxfromscratch org
conathan at gmail com
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Security vulnerabilities in Xorg. Could someone forward to
lfs-security? I'm not subscribed. Also, would someone be a dove and
see if there's a similar vulnerability in XFree86?
Also, substitute xorg.freedesktop.org for www.freedesktop.org in the
links below.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archi
On 6/19/06, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, if anyone is aware of any issues that have been reported over the
last couple of months and are still outstanding could you please get
them into Trac (where, arguably, they should have gone as well
as/instead of to the list) if they are
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 06/20/06 13:31 CST:
> * Linux-2.6.17 or stick with 2.6.16 series?
>
> * Package updates within same series (udev, e2fsprogs, shadow, bison?)
If we keep mentioning these types of issues, we will *never* get a
book out. Package updates (security issue with the ke
On 6/20/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 06/20/06 13:31 CST:
> * Linux-2.6.17 or stick with 2.6.16 series?
>
> * Package updates within same series (udev, e2fsprogs, shadow, bison?)
If we keep mentioning these types of issues, we will *never* get
Dan Nicholson wrote:
* Update test logs and failure info for toolchain: glibc, gcc, binutils
I can provide logs for PIII as Archaic asked a couple weeks ago. I'll
probably bootstrap a system using jhalfs for testing in the next week
or so.
Thanks, I think this is ticket #1659 or at least very
Okay, I have just gone through and installed Xorg 7.1 on my gcc-4.1.1
system. (temporarily back to non-ssp given the current problems with
libssp)
First of fall, I have a serious problem/regression? with glx.so under
this system.
I cannot for the life of me figure out how to go about solving thi
Hi guys,
Since there is a precedent set with the convert-mans shell script, I
thought it might be alright to add a simple shell script to rebuild
the info dir file. I'm always trying to remember the commands, then
end up looking here:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 06/20/06 15:28 CST:
> So, here's one implementation of a shell script that could be
> installed as /usr/bin/rebuild-info.
-1
Are you saying that users could remember 'rebuild-info' better than
'install-info'? Or is it just that if by chance they can remember
'r
I have a temporary solution to use gcc-4.1 ssp with uclibc-0.9.28. Don't use
the ssp library in uClibc (or arc4random), and use libssp from gcc. uClibc
can still build with -fstack-protector, but it will be linked to libssp.so. I
have known uClibc-cvs to be bug prone. Their next release will pro
On 6/20/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you guys think? I'm not closely attached to any details in
the script. It's just what seemed reasonable to me.
Just add a "cat ... EOF" to the commands that are in the current texinfo page.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Hi. when I use --enable-kernel=2.6.17 with glibc-2.4 or glibc-cvs, using
linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2 and linux-2.6.17.1, raw headers and running kernel, I
get:
./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/openat.c:156: error: 'va_start' used in function
with fixed args
With --enable-kernel=2.6.16 there's no problem. I r
Hi. I don't seriously expect these hideous commands to be added to the book,
but they should be usefull with future gcc versions to make a new patch
quickly. We can replace the specs patch with the following commands:
find gcc/config/ -name "*linux*.h" | xargs sed -e \
's@/lib/@/tools/li
13 matches
Mail list logo
