r3al1tych3ck wrote:
Sorry Bruce. Not embarrassed here.
By top posters never learn!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
r3al1tych3ck wrote:
sorry for my typos...but the guy *IS* right
Well, if you or the OP can provide definitive examples of where the book
is inconsistent then I will gladly reword it. As it is, the
introduction sections of each chapter are the only places where I am
aware we inform you of wh
Randy McMurchy wrote:
3. I thought LFS would have already by now put a package freeze
so that we can get a new release out (hint, hint)
Yeah, I know. Real life has been getting in the way. I should be able
to declare a package freeze some time this week. The plan will be:
1) Package f
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 03:27:01PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> Anyone having issues with any of the above feel free to point fingers
> and laugh in my general direction, oh and anything more constructive
> would be appreciated too :-)
There are still bugs that need to be dealt with. Some
Archaic,
Can you provide a link to that post?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:20:53PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Archaic,
>Can you provide a link to that post?
I'll link to every pending lfs-dev item in my inbox. The first one is a
summary with several more links (some of which are already dealt with).
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/l
Ken Moffat wrote:
Looks as if it can be fixed by 'touch man/*.1' after applying the
patch
Let's do just that.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
