steve crosby wrote:
iptables is one such application - currently non functional with jim's
script created headers, but have yet to identify why.
And iproute2. With Jim and Jürg's script created headers I can't get ip
to build. I've no idea what's broken in BLFS because I can't get out of LFS.
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
I thought iptables required the "raw" kernel source anyway?
No, it builds fine with just the sanitised 2.6.12 llc headers.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
>> I thought iptables required the "raw" kernel source anyway?
>
>
> No, it builds fine with just the sanitised 2.6.12 llc headers.
I stand corrected then.
(I really think it had a parameter to the kernel source tree in its make
command, though; it
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:11:31AM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> And iproute2. With Jim and Jürg's script created headers I can't get ip
> to build. I've no idea what's broken in BLFS because I can't get out of LFS.
>
I've built two clfs systems in the past few days (one, without any
audio/video
Hi Andy,
Andrew Benton schrieb:
steve crosby wrote:
iptables is one such application - currently non functional with jim's
script created headers, but have yet to identify why.
And iproute2. With Jim and Jürg's script created headers I can't get ip
to build. I've no idea what's broken in BLF
At the risk of being considered as one these
1.) if you've got no idea whats been discussed in these mails - don't
comment, we don't need a "can I have wirless tools" style
posters, in which case I do apologise for butting in amongst those who
aren't:
I notice that Bruce Dubbs wrote abo
Andrew Benton wrote:
> And iproute2. With Jim and Jürg's script created headers I can't get ip
> to build. I've no idea what's broken in BLFS because I can't get out of
> LFS.
I am running a complete LFS-SVN-20060418 system built with Jürg's headers
and so far everything is fine. I'm at QT right n
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> that's
> what I get for building a firewall box against the 4.something or 5.0
> book and then never updating it.)
Why? Did it fail? Was there a security issue?
Bottom line: you don't have to make upgrades unless there real reasons
to do so, not just because a package w
Kevin Buckley wrote:
> To my mind, having a full list of of all the users and groups that
> BLFS users MIGHT require, presented to readers of an LFS book, is akin
> to going WBLFS - "Way Beyond LFS".
Have you read BLFS? Specifically,
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/cvs/postlfs/users.ht
Kevin Buckley wrote these words on 05/01/06 07:33 CST:
> a general discussion about users and groups in BLFS that educates
> folk as to why they MIGHT need some users and groups "Beyond" what
> LFS has provided
I can see this added to the page on users and groups, but not a
complete discuss
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:00:16AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> In my opinion, expecting someone to read the beginning discussion
> for each section is unreasonable. We provide some information here,
> but nothing critical to build, or use, a package.
Why would it be unreasonable? If educatio
Andrew Benton wrote:
steve crosby wrote:
iptables is one such application - currently non functional with jim's
script created headers, but have yet to identify why.
And iproute2. With Jim and Jürg's script created headers I can't get
ip to build. I've no idea what's broken in BLFS because I
>
> Kevin Buckley wrote:
>
> > To my mind, having a full list of of all the users and groups that
> > BLFS users MIGHT require, presented to readers of an LFS book, is akin
> > to going WBLFS - "Way Beyond LFS".
>
> Have you read BLFS? Specifically,
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/c
Jim Gifford wrote:
Try Version 00.45, I built it with no issues, let me know.
Where is that? http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/headers is showing version
00.37 at the moment.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See th
Andrew Benton wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
Try Version 00.45, I built it with no issues, let me know.
Where is that? http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/headers is showing version
00.37 at the moment.
Andy
http://headers.cross-lfs.org - I'll update that version right now, thanx.
--
http://linuxfroms
Hi,
The linux-2.6.16.11-utf8_input-1.patch patch is missing on the patches repo.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:39:02PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The linux-2.6.16.11-utf8_input-1.patch patch is missing on the patches repo.
Thanks for the heads up, Manuel.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:39:02PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The linux-2.6.16.11-utf8_input-1.patch patch is missing on the patches repo.
The patch is in the repo, but doesn't get copied over until the book
re-renders.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your opera
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 03:10:04PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Yes, many are grossly wrong.
Yes, and something that will be greatly helped along by jhalfs, but
going back in memory to previous SBU threads, I believe it was decided
that SMP machines would be quite skewed. Hyprethreading acts
El Lunes, 1 de Mayo de 2006 22:48, Archaic escribió:
> The patch is in the repo, but doesn't get copied over until the book
> re-renders.
Oh, right. jhalfs is trying to download it from
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development, of course.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LF
El Lunes, 1 de Mayo de 2006 22:53, Archaic escribió:
> Yes, and something that will be greatly helped along by jhalfs, but
> going back in memory to previous SBU threads, I believe it was decided
> that SMP machines would be quite skewed. Hyprethreading acts like SMP
> (to what extent I'm not sure
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>
>> that's what I get for building a firewall box against the
>> 4.something or 5.0 book and then never updating it.)
>
> Why? Did it fail? Was there a security issue?
Well, I think there are security issues with Apache that I need to fix.
But that wo
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>>
>>> that's what I get for building a firewall box against the
>>> 4.something or 5.0 book and then never updating it.)
>> Why? Did it fail? Was there a security issue?
>
> Well, I think there are security issues with Apache tha
I'm just getting around to diff my logs from the alpha merge and ran
across these:
-PASS: gettext.test
-PASS: gettext2.test
+SKIP: gettext.test
+SKIP: gettext2.test
@@ -323,13 +323,13 @@
-PASS: lex3.test
+SKIP: lex3.test
-PASS: lex5.test
+SKIP: lex5.test
PASS: libobj2.test
PASS: libobj3.test
PA
Archaic wrote:
I'm just getting around to diff my logs from the alpha merge and ran
across these:
-PASS: gettext.test
-PASS: gettext2.test
+SKIP: gettext.test
+SKIP: gettext2.test
@@ -323,13 +323,13 @@
-PASS: lex3.test
+SKIP: lex3.test
-PASS: lex5.test
+SKIP: lex5.test
PASS: libobj2.test
PASS:
Chris Staub wrote:
Archaic wrote:
I'm guessing you mean Automake, not Autoconf. In any case, it looks like
it's because Automake is installed before Flex and Gettext. It was noted
in the Dependencies Appendix that Automake uses Flex and Gettext in its
testsuite, but I guess nobody (myself inc
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 06:15:50PM -0400, Chris Staub wrote:
>
> I'm guessing you mean Automake, not Autoconf.
Yes, hasty in my typing. :)
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Trying to close this ticket:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/1768
OK, here's a second go at it:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/html-lfs-trunk/chapter06/readjusting.html
and
http://linuxfromscratch.org/~jhuntwork/html-lfs-trunk/chapter06/gcc.html
Als
For the benefit of the community I copy you my email upstream due to a bug
in Bash-3.1.17: it gets lost looking for end of string in certain contexts.
Would be nice if other fellow participants of the list could confirm
similar finding. I hope it's not just me...
Richard
-
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:05:44PM -0300, Richard wrote:
>
> For the benefit of the community I copy you my email upstream due to a
> bug
> in Bash-3.1.17: it gets lost looking for end of string in certain contexts.
This issue was fixed around 3.1.10. If the patches were created properly
by
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 06:37:39PM -0600, Archaic wrote:
>
> This issue was fixed around 3.1.10. If the patches were created properly
> by us and applied properly by you, then this should not happen. I'll
> look into it. Thanks for the report.
Hrmm, the patch is right, and the only upstream patch
31 matches
Mail list logo
