Maybe it's just me, and I've overlooked something, but since I've
already made a big enough fool of myself this week, a little more won't
hurt if I'm wrong.
Now that udevstart no longer gets installed, r7443 took out the attempt
to run it. As far as I can see, when we try to run grub in chap
On 3/31/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now that udevstart no longer gets installed, r7443 took out the attempt
> to run it. As far as I can see, when we try to run grub in chapter 8 we
> don't have any disk devices for it to use. I can recall seeing mount
> --bind of the host's /d
Ken Moffat wrote:
Maybe it's just me, and I've overlooked something, but since I've
already made a big enough fool of myself this week, a little more won't
hurt if I'm wrong.
Now that udevstart no longer gets installed, r7443 took out the attempt
to run it. As far as I can see, when we try
Ken Moffat wrote:
Maybe it's just me, and I've overlooked something, but since I've
already made a big enough fool of myself this week, a little more won't
hurt if I'm wrong.
Now that udevstart no longer gets installed, r7443 took out the attempt
to run it. As far as I can see, when we try
Chris Staub wrote:
I don't see the instructions to create the devices either. Couldn't you
just start the udev bootscript? That's what I've done before...
That would interfere with udevd on the host. No go.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: h
On 3/31/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> See my previously-ignored message:
>
> http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2006-March/056447.html
>From the above post:
for DEVICE in /sys/block/*/dev /sys/block/*/*/dev ; do
IFS=: read MAJOR MINOR <$DEVI
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> See my previously-ignored message:
>
> http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2006-March/056447.html
>
Thanks for reminding me about that. I read that as if you were going
to commit it (but, I thought you didn't have comm
Randy McMurchy wrote:
In bugzilla, I could search for all bugs, (open, just mine, whatever)
that fit certain criteria and have it return relevant stuff. I would
like to poll the Trac system for all *open* bugs that may have Stunnel
in the subject. This was a piece of cake in Bugzilla, yet I canno
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
As Bruce already mentioned, there's filters that you can add or ammend.
s/ammend/amend/
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>
> > See my previously-ignored message:
> >
> > http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2006-March/056447.html
> >
> Thanks for reminding me about that. I read that as if you were go
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
See my previously-ignored message:
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2006-March/056447.html
BTW, I'm not sure this was intentionally ignored. I personally don't do
anything (as yet) with the udev_update branch and I don't think any of
t
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:19:15AM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>
> I propose to put this scriptlet into the udev_update book.
Actually, mount --bind seems the easier choice and the one I was working
on before I fell ill. Hopefully I'll be up to speed in a few days and
can start tackling t
Archaic wrote:
Actually, mount --bind seems the easier choice and the one I was working
on before I fell ill. Hopefully I'll be up to speed in a few days and
can start tackling this stuff again. For now, I'm only able to read a
few emails at a time between nausea attacks. :(
Eek. So that's wher
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Archaic wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:19:15AM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> >
> > I propose to put this scriptlet into the udev_update book.
>
> Actually, mount --bind seems the easier choice and the one I was working
> on before I fell ill. Hopefully I'll be u
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
So far, that's been Matt's baby. And I
know that he's had a few Real Life issues that have been keeping him busy.
And my apologies to Alexander and the rest of you for not letting you
know about my unavailability for LFS work over the last couple of weeks.
It's unlike
Perhaps I missed it (feel free to point me to the proper place in the
archives) but now tht udevtrigger ships w/ udev .. have "we" determined how
to use it in the bootscripts instead of the loop?
thanks!
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
http://doug.hunley.home
We offer best way for investment.
http://godaddy.com/investdot.com
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> Perhaps I missed it (feel free to point me to the proper place in the
> archives) but now tht udevtrigger ships w/ udev .. have "we" determined how
> to use it in the bootscripts instead of the loop?
> thanks!
>
Udev-088 (which has this) only got
On 3/30/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's right. I tried several iterations and was using openssl as a
> testbed. Some other places also got in though. I'd like to settle on:
>
>User Notes:
>
>
Bruce,
Actually what's in trunk right now for OpenSSL has a role="usern
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Udev-088 (which has this) only got into the udev_update branch
> yesterday. I created ticket 1756 against the bootscripts (referring
> back to the ticket for 088 containing Alexander's comments on this).
> I'm sure that the bootscripts maintainer will welcome tested patches
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Minimally tested (i.e., I've booted maybe 10-20 times and have never
> seen an issue) patch is attached.
Er, some comments on it. I didn't remove the walk_sysfs function since
my original intent was to revert the script if it failed and I couldn't
get it to work. But it w
21 matches
Mail list logo
