El Sábado, 25 de Marzo de 2006 22:41, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> To me, it just seems easier to work with dependencies all in one file
> rather than separately in each chapter06 file. Especially as we're
> looking at including another page (IIRC) that describes more of the
> rationale for depende
Hello World.
The gcc-specs patch seems to patch a lot of files that are architecture
specific. It seems to me that most of these archs are covered by
cross-LFS and LFS focuses mainly on i386. For i386 the gcc specs patch
can be replaced with these commands
# link to /tools/lib
cp gcc/config/sh/li
Andrew Benton wrote:
Hello World.
The gcc-specs patch seems to patch a lot of files that are architecture
specific. It seems to me that most of these archs are covered by
cross-LFS and LFS focuses mainly on i386. For i386 the gcc specs patch
can be replaced with these commands
# link to /tools/l
On 3/26/06, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello World.
>
> # link to /tools/lib
> cp gcc/config/sh/linux.h{,.orig}
> sed 's,r /l,r /tools/l,g' gcc/config/sh/linux.h.orig > gcc/config/sh/linux.h
> cp gcc/config/i386/gnu.h{,.orig}
> sed 's,r /l,r /tools/l,g' gcc/config/i386/gnu.h.orig >
Dan Nicholson wrote:
I prefer the sed as well, but I believe you've made more of it than
needs be. Certainly we don't need to adjust i386/gnu.h unless this
project is being converted to "Hurd from Scratch". :-)
He he, thanks for that. It just goes to show that I don't know what I'm
doing. I'
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:20:34AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/26/06, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is the piping through 'head' really necessary ?
> > > 'type -p' alone seems to do the job ...
> >
> > Indeed, "head" isn't needed even if the binary is in
