linux 2.6.15 and the linux-libc-headers project

2006-02-15 Thread kevin lyda
OK, I've read why I should use the linux libc headers project: http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/faq/2004-July/000159.html I've read the instructions in Chapter 5 on how to install it. However I now want to install Linux 2.6.15 and there is no corresponding linux-libc-headers tarball. I

Re: linux 2.6.15 and the linux-libc-headers project

2006-02-15 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/15/06, kevin lyda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've read the instructions in Chapter 5 on how to install it. However I > now want to install Linux 2.6.15 and there is no corresponding > linux-libc-headers tarball. In fact the oldest one is for Linux 2.6.12 > from July 2005. You can run a

Re: linux 2.6.15 and the linux-libc-headers project

2006-02-15 Thread Matthew Burgess
kevin lyda wrote: I've searched the mailing lists for LFS and don't see it any mention of this issue. Is anyone researching this? Can I help? It was brought up within the last couple of months on this list. The linux-libc-headers maintainer is having some issues with his hardware, but app

binutils to change ld search behavior

2006-02-15 Thread Dan Nicholson
Hi, It appears that binutils ld will be changing its search behavior to more closely follow ld.so. See this post: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00127.html It seems that rather than using the compiled in LIB_PATH that we make use of in Ch. 5 to repoint the linker to where we w

Re: binutils to change ld search behavior

2006-02-15 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/15/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > It appears that binutils ld will be changing its search behavior to > more closely follow ld.so. See this post: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00127.html By the way, this has been checked into HEAD: http://sou

Re: binutils to change ld search behavior

2006-02-15 Thread Greg Schafer
Dan Nicholson wrote: > It appears that binutils ld will be changing its search behavior to > more closely follow ld.so. See this post: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00127.html > > It seems that rather than using the compiled in LIB_PATH that we make > use of in Ch. 5 to r

Re: binutils to change ld search behavior

2006-02-15 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/15/06, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > It seems that rather than using the compiled in LIB_PATH that we make > > use of in Ch. 5 to repoint the linker to where we want, the default > > will be that the paths in /etc/ld.so.conf will be preferred before > > t