I just noticed that gtk+-2.8.6 doesn't say it needs glib-2.8.3 or am I
missing something here? I'm sure it used to be a required dep.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Richard A Downing wrote:
I just noticed that gtk+-2.8.6 doesn't say it needs glib-2.8.3 or am I
missing something here?
blfs-dev, perhaps? :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
I know that they total to less than 100K, but are lessecho and lesskey
needed in /bin? Perhaps we should install everything with
--prefix=/usr and move less to /bin?
Would you mind putting this in bugzilla please?
Cheers,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/li
El Viernes, 14 de Octubre de 2005 22:56, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> Yeah, I hit the missing patches.ent file today too. As it's a fairly
> safe change to do (`make validate' and the rendering process that copies
> the patches will catch any inadvertent errors) feel free to backport
> patches.e
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
>> I just noticed that gtk+-2.8.6 doesn't say it needs glib-2.8.3 or am I
>> missing something here?
>
>
> blfs-dev, perhaps? :)
Damn, I used one of those infernal cross-posted mailsing to pick the To:!
Sorry.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch
I just noticed that gtk+-2.8.6 doesn't say it needs glib-2.8.3 or am I
missing something here? I'm sure it used to be a required dep.
R.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hello people,
I just updated my copy of glibc-cvs and for the first time in ages it passed
all the tests. I don't remember the last time it passed all the tests. For the
last couple of weeks there's been a problem with perl hanging when I ran
configure, that's fixed too. I used gcc-4.0.2 and di
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
Hello people,
I just updated my copy of glibc-cvs and for the first time in ages it passed
all the tests. I don't remember the last time it passed all the tests. For
Party at Andrew's house!
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
I wrote:
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Sábado, 15 de Octubre de 2005 04:54, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
1. For the UTF-8 book, it is also needed to download
glibc-libidn-2.3.5.tar.bz2 from lfs-matrix. Please handle this similarly
to glibc-linuxthreads and bash-doc tarballs.
This and the groff
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote these words on 10/16/05 04:39 CST:
>
>>I just noticed that gtk+-2.8.6 doesn't say it needs glib-2.8.3 or am I
>>missing something here? I'm sure it used to be a required dep.
>
>
> GTK+ requires Pango, which requires GLib. It still is a required
>
Attached is a patch to fix the alpha order of patches (mostly for
mips). Removed a grep patch that was listed twice on the mips patches
page. svn diff from /branches/cross-lfs/BOOK directory.
--
Justin R. Knierim
lfs at lfs dash matrix dot net
Index: materials/mips64/patches.xml
=
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:15:24AM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> >
> >[]
> >
> >if [ "$i" = "082-groff" ] ; then {do something} ; fi.
> >
> >[]
>
> Yep, I completely agree. The line above, for example, could probably read:
>
> if echo $i | grep -q "groff"
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Justin R. Knierim wrote:
Attached is a patch to fix the alpha order of patches (mostly for mips).
Removed a grep patch that was listed twice on the mips patches page. svn
diff from /branches/cross-lfs/BOOK directory.
Thanks, commited in r7032.
Ken
--
das eine Mal a
On 10/16/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> > I know that they total to less than 100K, but are lessecho and lesskey
> > needed in /bin? Perhaps we should install everything with
> > --prefix=/usr and move less to /bin?
>
> Would you mind putting this in bugz
Seth W. Klein wrote:
That is, in the general case, broken due to quoting. Try:
if echo "$i" | grep -q groff ; then ... ; fi
(grep -q isn't portable, either, but you may not care.)
In any case, the following is portable and fast. (Forks are expensive
and grep is never a builtin.)
cas
On 10/16/05, Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that they total to less than 100K, but are lessecho and lesskey
> needed in /bin? Perhaps we should install everything with
> --prefix=/usr and move less to /bin?
>
Another one :-) bashbug (installed by bash) should also be in /usr/
16 matches
Mail list logo
