Re: FAQ Maintainer?

2005-09-21 Thread Anderson Lizardo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Burgess wrote: > Anderson Lizardo wrote: > >> Yes, the lfswww group is still needed (and it needs to be synced >> everytime commits privileges are given to someone). > > > Thanks. For some reason I was confusing the 'cvslfs' and 'lfswww' >

Re: RFC - Cross-LFS Future

2005-09-21 Thread Anderson Lizardo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Burgess wrote: > sort that out. I can't think of any other infrastructure tasks that > need to be carried out, though polite reminders are always useful :) - - Add a Bugzilla product entry for the new book. - - Make an official announcement?