Anderson Lizardo wrote:
Yes, the lfswww group is still needed (and it needs to be synced
everytime commits privileges are given to someone).
Thanks. For some reason I was confusing the 'cvslfs' and 'lfswww'
groups last night, and it was the 'cvs' related groups I was concerned
about still h
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
After some discussion with Gerard, he has requested I prepare a
proposal to the LFS community concerning the Cross-LFS book.
Have we reached any sort of decision with this? Gerard, Matt, Jim?
I replied 22 minutes after Jim sent the original RFC, say
El Martes, 20 de Septiembre de 2005 19:53, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> I replied 22 minutes after Jim sent the original RFC, saying I agree
> with it in principle. Once Gerard confirms, Jim can email me in private
> and I'll set up the Subversion repository and book rendering. I don't
> have any
Quadrata! You gotta email me from a non-lfs address (unless you're
gonna keep this one, which I doubt) so maybe if I'm up in yonkers
(*cough* I mean the bronx) we can get a beer or somethin :)
Mike
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
U
*Sigh*
Not sure what to say here. It's been a good year or so. A lot has been
accomplished, I hope, for the better. I've learned a great deal from
LFS, and I've had a good time.
It has become clear to me, however, that I need to make a break with
LFS. It has taken over, to an extent, in my l
> Thanks again - I've enjoyed it immensely.
And vice-versa. :) Thank you for everything, Jeremy. :)
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
So long, and thanks for all the fish! (or however that goes)
You live in NY? How about a bowl of noodles off times square sometime?
It'd be worth the trip from CT.
~Jason
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the
My friend, I hate to see you leave, but I respect your decision. Stay in
touch and remember you will always be welcomed here.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.lin
Michael Kipper wrote these words on 09/20/05 14:40 CST:
> xpdf was the program I wanted out of the package.
> Should Motif not be a required prerequisite then?
It already is. However, BLFS uses the Lesstif package instead of
OpenMotif.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [g
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Not sure what to say here. It's been a good year or so. A lot has been
accomplished, I hope, for the better. I've learned a great deal from
LFS, and I've had a good time.
Jeremy,
Thanks very much for all your efforts that have encompassed so many
different areas of th
El Martes, 20 de Septiembre de 2005 21:19, Jeremy Huntwork escribió:
> Thanks again - I've enjoyed it immensely.
Thanks to you for all the work done :-)
I will try to keep alive your other child: jhalfs.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
L
Matthew Burgess wrote:
As to the bugs that Jeremy mentioned, noone has seen
them on the straight x86->x86 builds that LFS is currently focusing on,
and therefore I don't see a problem with our current approach.
gcc-4.x/patched glibc-2.3.5 based LFS builds have proven stable for a
fair number o
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
For what it's worth I built my current LFS with current glibc cvs on Sunday
and it doesn't seem unstable at all. I didn't need to patch glibc to build it
with gcc-4.0.1. The glibc test suite had three fails, two of them were
familiar maths test-doubl
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Thanks again - I've enjoyed it immensely.
Thanks for all you've done, maybe we'll see you back one day.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfrom
M.Canales.es wrote:
... and to create the web pages for that new project ;-)
Yep, this too. :) Once Jim gets the OK, I will tackle this part.
--
Justin R. Knierim
lfs at lfs dash matrix dot net
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/fa
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 09/20/05 15:53 CST:
> Please revert the change and comment out the note for now. When
> building Ch 6, I will see if Option 2 mentioned above can still be
> used.
That would be nice if you tried it again. This is what crossed up
Bruce and I so badly when we t
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Thanks again - I've enjoyed it immensely.
Thanks for all your hard work. You will be missed. I will do my best
to work with Alexander and Thomas to keep that ball rolling, so don't
you worry about that. Hope to see you around still. Take care.
--
Justin R. Knieri
Bye quadrata... take good care of yourself and thank you for all you've
done... you will be missed
sash a/k/a Karen
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
It has become clear to me, however, that I need to make a break with
LFS. It has taken over, to an extent, in my life. It have let it crowd
out time for
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Not sure what to say here. It's been a good year or so. A lot has been
accomplished, I hope, for the better. I've learned a great deal from
LFS, and I've had a good time.
Thank you all for your kind replies. I must admit that I got a little
choked up when I saw the numb
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> It has become clear to me, however, that I need to make a break with
> LFS.
Sorry you have to leave. Thanks for all you've done. You will be
welcomed back if you decide to finish your "break". In the meantime,
have fun. Life to too short not to have fun.
-- Bruce
-
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Thanks Jeremy. You will be missed. Have fun in your new endevours.
James
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Jeremy Huntwork([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 03:19:45PM -0400:
>
> It has become clear to me, however, that I need to make a break with
> LFS. It has taken over, to an extent, in my life. It have let it crowd
> out time for things that should have always been more important.
>
Hi Je
22 matches
Mail list logo