Gerard Beekmans wrote:
On July 2, 2005 11:16 am, Robert Connolly wrote:
Maybe someone knows a friendly isp who will adjust charges month to month
based on usage. Also, it would be a nice kick if the server was a legal
non-profit company, maybe some sort of charity, so that contributions coul
Hello,
I've worked through the LFS-dev book (SVN-20050702) and I am stuck with the
following problem:
# chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
> HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
> PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \
> /tools/bin/bash --login +h
chroot: cannot run comman
Roberto Nibali wrote:
> chroot("/var/tmp/LFS") = 0
> chdir("/") = 0
> execve("/tools/bin/env", ["/tools/bin/env", "-i", "HOME=/root", "TERM=linux",
> "PS1=\\u:\\w\\$ ", "PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sb"..., "/tools/bin/bash",
> "--login", "+h"], [/* 71
Roberto Nibali wrote:
I've worked through the LFS-dev book (SVN-20050702) and I am stuck with the
following problem:
# chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \
/tools/bin/bash --login +h
chroot: cannot
>>chroot("/var/tmp/LFS") = 0
>>chdir("/") = 0
>>execve("/tools/bin/env", ["/tools/bin/env", "-i", "HOME=/root", "TERM=linux",
>>"PS1=\\u:\\w\\$ ", "PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sb"..., "/tools/bin/bash",
>>"--login", "+h"], [/* 71 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT
Hello Everyone:
The LFS Website Team has been working on a new website for the Linux
From Scratch community. We have shown it briefly before, but it is now
nearly fully functional and filled with content. Our goal with this new
site was to produce a simple and readable site that is easy to nav
> NOOO :) Those things are pitifully slow. Not to mention things
> have to be done quite differently on mips boxes.
Actually, they have Intel/AMD architecture too. ;) And they're pretty
inexpensive. :D
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hello Everyone:
The LFS Website Team has been working on a new website for the Linux
From Scratch community. We have shown it briefly before, but it is now
nearly fully functional and filled with content. Our goal with this
new site was to produce a simple and readable
> Please visit this new proposed site (follow the link below)
> and reply to
> the website mailing list with your thoughts or comments. We
> would like
> to hear from the community as to whether they would like to
> see this new
> design implemented.
>
> http://beta.linuxfromscratch.org/
>
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 08:21 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Hello Everyone:
>
> The LFS Website Team has been working on a new website for the Linux
> From Scratch community. We have shown it briefly before, but it is now
> nearly fully functional and filled with content. Our goal with this new
On 7/6/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please visit this new proposed site (follow the link below) and reply to
> the website mailing list with your thoughts or comments. We would like
> to hear from the community as to whether they would like to see this new
> design implemente
On July 5, 2005 01:22 am, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Gerard, I have a few 1U cases I can get my hands on.
I'd have to check to make sure the hardware I have here will actually fit in a
1U case. Some of the hardware that was donated a while ago is in standard
desktop configuration (mostly the motherboa
steve crosby wrote:
Clean, and good looking
Thank you.
- just one question. Was it a concious choice
to make the top menu right justified? For most languages, reading from
left to right is the norm, and the right justified menus seem "odd".
For those of us with high resolution screens, it's
David Fix wrote:
Well, if my two cents is worth anything... It looks GREAT. :) Not
"polished" like the old site, but the layout is certainly more intuitive and
easier to follow!
What do you think would make it look "polished"?
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
F
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 07:21, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Please visit this new proposed site (follow the link below) and reply to
> the website mailing list with your thoughts or comments. We would like
> to hear from the community as to whether they would like to see this new
> design implemented
> What do you think would make it look "polished"?
>
> --
> JH
Hmm... :) I think, really, that the logo on the "old" site, with the soft
drop-shadows and the way the menu highlights give it the look... :) I
think that the menu highlights just need a little "3d'ing" to give them that
edge. :)
David Fix wrote:
Hmm... :) I think, really, that the logo on the "old" site, with the soft
drop-shadows and the way the menu highlights give it the look... :) I
think that the menu highlights just need a little "3d'ing" to give them that
edge. :) *shrug* Perhaps I'm just used to the old o
On 7/5/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Everyone:
>
> The LFS Website Team has been working on a new website for the Linux
> From Scratch community. We have shown it briefly before, but it is now
> nearly fully functional and filled with content. Our goal with this new
> sit
Pretty slick. Much nicer than the old one. Some of the links point to
nowhere though. I guess that will be fixed as it goes in production.
Any chance of changing the search engine too? I find that it is not
very accurate and that the way it highlights the search terms makes it
hard to read the res
steve crosby wrote:
For those of us with high resolution screens, it's also a fair
distance to move the mouse ;)
When I work on a high-resolution screen, I avoid maximizing browser
windows. If I maximize a browser window, lines of text become more than
66 characters long and therefore difficu
El Martes, 5 de Julio de 2005 08:39, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
> I think that the biggest trouble is that xpointer expressions include
> some meaningless offset numbers like para[2] instead of assigning a
> meaningful name to the exact text to be copied to another page.
The more simplest wa
Ahmed El-Daly wrote:
Pretty slick. Much nicer than the old one. Some of the links point to
nowhere though. I guess that will be fixed as it goes in production.
Yep, and they'll be fixed even sooner if you would be so kind to specify
exactly *which* links are broken :)
Regards,
Matt.
--
http
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 07:33:23PM -0400, Chris Staub wrote:
> "SBU" is still referred to as "Static Binutils Unit".
Thanks. Fixed.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfrom
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Ahmed El-Daly wrote:
Pretty slick. Much nicer than the old one. Some of the links point to
nowhere though. I guess that will be fixed as it goes in production.
Yep, and they'll be fixed even sooner if you would be so kind to specify
exactly *which* links are broken :)
Roberto Nibali wrote:
> I really think it's a problem of that missing linux-gate.so.1,
It's "provided" by the kernel, though, I think. I get the same output
from ldd, and my system works.
> The $LFS was built with a SuSE 9.3 host system, maybe this is an
> issue.
Possibly. Which kernel does t
Hey, really a nice and clearly structured new website layout. Really an
improvement and I like it very much. In my opinion you can navigate much
more intuitively, now.
Regards,
Robert
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Jeremy Huntwor
On 7/6/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> steve crosby wrote:
> > Oh, and you can make the menu selections look more like "tabs" using
> > CSS with relative ease.
>
> Sure. :) But again, the look is intentional. Out of curiosity, what did
> you have in mind there?
>
Something on
Dear List,
apologies for the delay. This is
just reassurance, confirming what others have
reported. And, again, apologies for the broken
threading.
I've just done a clean blfs-6.1-pre1 build, with
no changes except
(a) adding a few languages to the GCC build
(the easy way o
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:29:19AM +0100, Bernard Leak wrote:
>
>Evidently the problem is not exposed in this
> set-up, though I have applied none of the specific
> patches to gawk which are (also) supposed to
> eliminate the problem. Whether that means the
> problem has "gone away" or not I
You need to use binutils-2.16 and it
gets past the gas error.
I am building on FC4/Rawhide => FC5
Yeah, glutton for punishment :-)
PFE
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
DJ Lucas wrote:
> AFAICT, there is no easy way to do hexadecimal expansion in ashI
> don't think it's worth fixing.
I believe the "customary" way is to use bc for arithmetic. Of course
that introduces a dependency.
Personally, I don't see a good reason not to use bash. I know its been
disc
steve crosby wrote:
Something onlong the lines of this:
http://nontroppo.org/test/tab1.html
Just a thought tho ;)
That's nice. I really like it. :)
However, I'm not sure if we should go about changing what we have on
beta. For my own personal site there's a *lot* of design elements that I
w
On 7/5/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> > AFAICT, there is no easy way to do hexadecimal expansion in ashI
> > don't think it's worth fixing.
>
> I believe the "customary" way is to use bc for arithmetic. Of course
> that introduces a dependency.
>
> Personal
Archaic wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 07:33:23PM -0400, Chris Staub wrote:
"SBU" is still referred to as "Static Binutils Unit".
Thanks. Fixed.
Almost. :) It's no longer "static".
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
U
Dear List,
before I spread any more confusion:
my last message was entirely wrong. Grovelling
apologies. After correcting a
silly mistake (which led to me using the wrong
glibc) I still see the problem I reported
earlier. That is, building LFS-6.1-pre1 but
with glibc-2.3.5 rather th
Chris Staub wrote:
Archaic wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 07:33:23PM -0400, Chris Staub wrote:
"SBU" is still referred to as "Static Binutils Unit".
Thanks. Fixed.
Almost. :) It's no longer "static".
Never mind - I just saw Matthew's message stating that this is fixed as
well. :)
Bernard Leak wrote:
After correcting a
silly mistake (which led to me using the wrong
glibc) I still see the problem I reported
earlier.
Bernard,
What locale are you using (i.e. what do your LC_* and LANG look like)?
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ
38 matches
Mail list logo
