M.Canales.es wrote:
El Jueves, 23 de Junio de 2005 08:24, Archaic escribió:
I made some changes in my WC and created a diff to see if something like
this might be usable and worthwhile. Basically it just keeps us from
having to update the test results link in abouttestsuites.xml.
Look a good
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Done. Added mktemp-1.5-add_tempfile-2.patch
Thanks Tush and Bernard. I've updated the book to incorporate the new
version of the patch.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: Se
Hello lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org,
We have received your request to join the CHETANA-JOBS
group hosted by Yahoo! Groups, a free, easy-to-use community service.
This request will expire in 7 days.
TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE GROUP:
1) Go to the Yahoo! Groups site by clicking on this link:
Hello lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org,
We have received your request to join the CHETANA-JOBS
group hosted by Yahoo! Groups, a free, easy-to-use community service.
This request will expire in 7 days.
TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE GROUP:
1) Go to the Yahoo! Groups site by clicking on this link:
Hello lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org,
We have received your request to join the CHETANA-JOBS
group hosted by Yahoo! Groups, a free, easy-to-use community service.
This request will expire in 7 days.
TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE GROUP:
1) Go to the Yahoo! Groups site by clicking on this link:
I noticed on linking a gtkmm app that the gcc source directory is listed
as a library directory. e.g.
(snip)
-L/tools/build/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/tools/build/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/tools/build/gcc-build/gcc
(/snip)
I build in /tools/b
David Jensen wrote:
I noticed on linking a gtkmm app that the gcc source directory is listed
as a library directory. e.g.
(snip)
-L/tools/build/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/tools/build/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/tools/build/gcc-build/gcc
This is
Matthew Burgess wrote:
David Jensen wrote:
I noticed on linking a gtkmm app that the gcc source directory is
listed as a library directory. e.g.
(snip)
-L/tools/build/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/tools/build/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/tools/buil
Hi all,
I've read recently about an impending release of LFS-6.1. I have rendered
the XML sources and looked this version over (Testing). I have most of it
installed in my test build right now.
However, my question is this:
How was/is this version advertised to the community, and more importantl
El Sábado, 25 de Junio de 2005 18:01, Randy McMurchy escribió:
> Hi all,
> However, my question is this:
All that is a know issue that should be adderssed ASAP:
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2005-June/051727.html
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://w
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 06/25/05 11:19 CST:
> All that is a know issue that should be adderssed ASAP:
>
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2005-June/051727.html
I apparently overlooked this thread, or have forgotten about it.
Either way, thanks for the link to the recent t
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 11:32:10AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Is there anyone who can review these patches, and apply them if they
> are deemed worthy?
First, go to http://beta.linuxfromscratch.org
Then subscribe to website@ and pull this repo:
svn co svn://linuxfromscratch.org/www2
--
A
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 02:02:57AM -0600, Archaic wrote:
>
Anyone else have any comments? Matt? Randy?
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
Archaic wrote these words on 06/25/05 11:46 CST:
> First, go to http://beta.linuxfromscratch.org
>
> Then subscribe to website@ and pull this repo:
> svn co svn://linuxfromscratch.org/www2
Is there a timeline for converting to the new website?
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 200
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:15PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Is there a timeline for converting to the new website?
Hopefully less than 2 weeks. Trying to roll it out before or at the same
time as 6.1 for marketing reasons. IIRC, news items are the only thing
lacking a roll out.
--
Archa
El Sábado, 25 de Junio de 2005 19:16, Archaic escribió:
> Hopefully less than 2 weeks. Trying to roll it out before or at the same
> time as 6.1 for marketing reasons. IIRC, news items are the only thing
> lacking a roll out.
The links to translated books are missing also on the new site.
--
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:24:20PM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
>
> The links to translated books are missing also on the new site.
Please send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfroms
Archaic wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:15PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Is there a timeline for converting to the new website?
Hopefully less than 2 weeks. Trying to roll it out before or at the same
time as 6.1 for marketing reasons. IIRC, news items are the only thing
lacking a roll
Archaic wrote:
I'm starting to think perhaps the format for both should be:
info program-name under the node-name section
Hrm. This doesn't really seem to do it for me either, though. I think
something needs to show that 'info program-name' is a command to run.
Issue 2:
A base /e
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 01:39:55PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> Hrm. This doesn't really seem to do it for me either, though. I think
> something needs to show that 'info program-name' is a command to run.
Of course in xml it will be info program-name. I just
didn't think I needed to be tha
Archaic wrote:
I would have agreed with you before glibc required tmpfs to pass it's
checks and shared memory became common. Are you aware of any popular
distro that *doesn't* include tmpfs in the default configuration?
The reason is that the bootscripts use tmpfs, so when explaining the
manual
Archaic wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 01:39:55PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Hrm. This doesn't really seem to do it for me either, though. I think
something needs to show that 'info program-name' is a command to run.
Of course in xml it will be info program-name. I just
didn't think I nee
Randy McMurchy wrote:
I realize there is an effort to migrate the web site to a new setup.
But, I also notice that the only person who does any real work on the
web site is also the project lead for the nALFS team, an active LFS
editor, and the project lead for the LIVECD project.
Sorry, being
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 06/25/05 12:55 CST:
> Sorry, being the one you're speaking about here, I feel a little
> impelled so say something on this note. I agree with your point about my
> time and efforts being stretched, and would definitely appreciate more
> hands for the work. H
Randy McMurchy wrote:
My initial post was an offer to help get something current on the
*web site that we currently have*. Apparently, there is no interest
there, so please disregard the noise.
Did you see my other message in this thread? I told you what you could
do to help *now*. I can't j
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 06/25/05 13:43 CST:
> Did you see my other message in this thread? I told you what you could
> do to help *now*.
No, I glossed over that. My sincere apologies.
However, seeing how the new site is due for release in 2 weeks or
less, perhaps efforts to improve
All,
I have been playing with BZ 2.18.1 in my lab. I want to upgrade our two
instances as soon as possible - probably this evening if possible. The
product now supports a bug "move" function that lets you take bugs from
one bz instance and move it to another. Perfect for our needs of
mergi
Archaic wrote:
Sorry, I thought I'd already replied to this :(
Issue 1:
I really can't tell which method of referencing an 'info' page is better.
Issue 2:
A base /etc/profile below sets
sed s/A/The/
Agreed.
Issue 3:
such locales are not supported by LFS in any way.
s
James Robertson wrote:
All,
It has also come to my attention that not all are happy with the way bz
is set up in our shop. The tool has an extensive template system that
we can take advantage of as well to customize certain pieces. Post here
if you have a wish list of some kind.
Thanks
29 matches
Mail list logo
