The inputrc page located at:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter07/inputrc.html
is currently loaded with much more text than is needed, IMO, and is
rather convoluted, too. Likewise, it refers to an /etc/skel directory
which LFS does not create (nor does it create any regular
Referencing:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter07/profile.html
Issue 1:
the following text sounds odd to me:
###
For more information, see info bash - Nodes: Bash Startup Files and
Interactive Shells.
###
There is on
> Issue 1:
>
> the following text sounds odd to me:
>
> ###
> For more information, see info bash - Nodes: Bash Startup Files and
> Interactive Shells.
> ###
> Issue 3:
>
> such locales are not supported by LFS in any way.
>
> sug
> The inputrc page located at:
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter07/inp
> utrc.html
>
> is currently loaded with much more text than is needed, IMO, and is
> rather convoluted, too. Likewise, it refers to an /etc/skel directory
> which LFS does not create (nor does it cr
Forwarding to lfs-dev for consideration.
--
JH
From Don Porter in the lfs-dev list:
Hello,
I'm one of the maintainers of the Tcl programming language.
Lately we're seeing a small but increasing number of bug reports submitted
against Tcl coming from people attempting to follow the Linux Fro
Archaic wrote:
> FIXME: The following comment needs rewritten
>
> # Make sure we don't output everything on the 1 line set
> horizontal-scroll-mode Off
>
> Suggested:
>
> # Allow the command prompt to wrap to the next line set
> horizontal-scroll-mode Off
How about:
# Allow long commands to wr
In the inputrc page I noticed an tag. In HTML it was
converted to . However, I do not see any
difference in the output of this text. So I looked at the stylesheets
and sure enough, that class isn't listed.
So now the question is; is this an unneeded tag that should be stripped,
or is this an erro
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 05:48:01PM -0400, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> >
> Doesn't tar require the -Z option to decompress .tar.Z files? I thought
> it did. Or is this the "tar-1.15.1 and newer" comment? The info page
> (1.15.1) doesn't say anything about automagically guessing the file type...
It i
Dear All,
apologies if I'm doing something completely stupid.
(or duplicating an existing question - though I don't think
I am).
I've followed LFS 6.0 very, very nearly 100%: see later for
differences (a list complete in intention: certainly no other
differences looked important fo
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
On 6/22/05, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
export LINGUAS="it es"
Many moons ago I had tried this approach, but some packages failed
during compilation. I did not dig deeper. Found it was easier to just
remove the unwanted translations.
Maybe the situ
I wrote:
3) wget, gcc and glibc install all translations when LINGUAS is set to
empty value. Easily worked around by setting LINGUAS to something
invalid like "xx".
oops, forgot to mention util-linux.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http:
On 6/24/05, Bernard Leak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>apologies if I'm doing something completely stupid.
> (or duplicating an existing question - though I don't think
> I am).
The only stupid question is one left unasked ;)
>output as requested, and then seems to han
El Jueves, 23 de Junio de 2005 13:09, Archaic escribió:
> In the inputrc page I noticed an tag. In HTML it was
> converted to . However, I do not see any
> difference in the output of this text. So I looked at the stylesheets
> and sure enough, that class isn't listed.
>
> So now the question is;
El Jueves, 23 de Junio de 2005 08:24, Archaic escribió:
> I made some changes in my WC and created a diff to see if something like
> this might be usable and worthwhile. Basically it just keeps us from
> having to update the test results link in abouttestsuites.xml.
Look a good idea to me.
--
M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: archaic
Date: 2005-06-23 11:22:06 -0600 (Thu, 23 Jun 2005)
New Revision: 6128
Fine for testing, with the obvious omission of the erroneous Makefile
change :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsu
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Fine for testing, with the obvious omission of the erroneous Makefile
change :)
Whoops, this should have gone to lfs-book of course. Sorry for the
noise folks.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscr
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Forwarding to lfs-dev for consideration.
Sorry for the noise on this one - I was told I posted something that
already had been.
However, I'm still of the opinion that our install instructions should
be slightly altered for tcl and expect so that we can make use of th
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:57:01PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> However, I'm still of the opinion that our install instructions should
> be slightly altered for tcl and expect so that we can make use of the
> --with-tclinclude flag for expect.
Please file a bug under svn for this and perha
18 matches
Mail list logo
