Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
a) drop 8139cp (in preference to 8139too), eepro100 (in preference to
e100), dmfe (in preference to tulip), xircom_tulip_cb (in preference to
xircom_cb, and it doesn't load anyway because of missing symbols). If
you disagree because this breaks your network access
Seeing as noone else has posted this to lfs-dev, I will:
Slashdot is carrying a link to an IBM article about LFS from May 24th.
The IBM article can be found at:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/os-lfs/?ca=dgr-lnxw01BuildLinux
The slashdot post can be found at:
http://linux.slas
from
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.html
#
From now on, when reentering the chroot environment after exiting, use
the following modified chroot command:
chroot "$LFS" /usr/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
PATH=/bi
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 12:56, Archaic wrote:
> from
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.html
>
> #
> From now on, when reentering the chroot environment after exiting, use
> the following modified chroot command:
>
> chroot "$LFS" /usr/bin/env -i
El Martes, 7 de Junio de 2005 19:56, Archaic escribió:
> from
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.ht
>ml
The redaction changes look fine to me.
>
> This brought up a philosophical debate in my mind. If the book mentions
> moving the sources, but then proceed
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:08:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> My suggestion is to leave that part completely out of chapter 6 and put
> it in as an appendix to the book. It is extremely confusing after you
> do that and then go to chapter 7.
Did you read my changes? If so please re-repl
Archaic wrote these words on 06/07/05 23:30 CST:
> Suggestions? Comments? Feedback is requested, please.
Is there any way you can perhaps make a short paragraph of what
you are suggesting? I read your original email earlier today, but
it was simply too much to think about. I got lost.
So, I just
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Is there any way you can perhaps make a short paragraph of what
> you are suggesting? I read your original email earlier today, but
> it was simply too much to think about. I got lost.
Basically rewording nearly an entire page du
Archaic wrote these words on 06/07/05 23:55 CST:
> Basically rewording nearly an entire page due to the fact that it is
> both hand-holding and confusing at the same time. The reason I call it
> hand-holding is that even a *suggestion* in the book (without any other
> counter-suggestions) will lea
On 6/7/05, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> from
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.html
> -snip-
>
> The packages and patches stored in /sources can also be moved to a
> more usual location, such as /usr/src/packages. The entire directory can
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
