Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>
> Since the proposal to add translated messages to the bootscripts failed,
> wc should work fine (all strings it operated upon are ASCII-only) and the sed
> s/././g command is not needed.
>
> Or should we keep that just in case so that the proposal can be easily
>
DJ Lucas wrote:
> Matthias Berndt wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> wouldn't it make sense to move 'wc' from '/usr/bin' to '/bin' like
>> other tools in the coreutils-package to prevent some more or less
>> cryptic constructions in '/etc/rc.d/init.d/functions'? FHS don't tell me
>> anything against this
Matthias Berndt wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> wouldn't it make sense to move 'wc' from '/usr/bin' to '/bin' like
> other tools in the coreutils-package to prevent some more or less
> cryptic constructions in '/etc/rc.d/init.d/functions'? FHS don't tell me
> anything against this idea.
>
> Matthias Bern
Greetings,
wouldn't it make sense to move 'wc' from '/usr/bin' to '/bin' like
other tools in the coreutils-package to prevent some more or less
cryptic constructions in '/etc/rc.d/init.d/functions'? FHS don't tell me
anything against this idea.
Matthias Berndt
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mail
