On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:46:16 +0100 (MET), Alexander Kozlov
> wrote:
>>
>> You are right, libidn is not mentioned in the book, my fault.
>> There is libidn/ directory in the snapshot source tree which is
>> absent in glibc-2.9 release. Is
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:30:25 -0500, Randy McMurchy
wrote:
> Matt, the OP is right. In official releases, the Glibc tarball does not
> ship with libidn. But we've been using snapshots which *do* include it.
Of course, thanks for the reminder. I've got the glibc-libidn tarball
book patch queued
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 03/20/09 07:02 CST:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:35:06 +0100 (MET), Alexander Kozlov
> wrote:
>> there is no libidn/ in glibc-2.9 release, contrary to the contents
>> of Chap.6. It appears in gnu snapshots though.
>
> Could you be more s
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:46:16 +0100 (MET), Alexander Kozlov
wrote:
>>> there is no libidn/ in glibc-2.9 release, contrary to the
>>> contents of Chap.6. It appears in gnu snapshots though.
>>
>> Could you be more specific please? I can't see any
>> there is no libidn/ in glibc-2.9 release, contrary to the
>> contents of Chap.6. It appears in gnu snapshots though.
>
> Could you be more specific please? I can't see any reference to
> libidn in
>
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:35:06 +0100 (MET), Alexander Kozlov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is no libidn/ in glibc-2.9 release, contrary to the contents
> of Chap.6. It appears in gnu snapshots though.
Could you be more specific please? I can't see any reference
Hi,
there is no libidn/ in glibc-2.9 release, contrary to the contents
of Chap.6. It appears in gnu snapshots though.
Regards,
Alex.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
