Re: gcc 6.15.1 and 5.10 (svn-20090601)

2009-06-06 Thread Tobias Gasser
>> * * PART2 >> the testsuite complains about 'getline' >> same error, thus same fix as with binutils: >> sed -i -e 's/getline/get_line/' libiberty/testsuite/test-demangle.c > > There's a gcc-bugs list, and a Bugzilla instance running. I suspect > they've already been notified, but it wouldn't h

Re: gcc 6.15.1 and 5.10 (svn-20090601)

2009-06-05 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Tobias Gasser wrote: > i can't find any XCFLAGS in the gcc/Makefile.in Looking at "svn blame", and tracking back through the state of the book at various svn revisions, that sed was committed when we still used gcc-4.3.2. Wouldn't surprise me if they changed the way this was specified now. Ah, i

gcc 6.15.1 and 5.10 (svn-20090601)

2009-06-05 Thread Tobias Gasser
** PART 1 the book actualy applies sed -i 's/^XCFLAGS =$/& -fomit-frame-pointer/' \ gcc/Makefile.in ;; but: i can't find any XCFLAGS in the gcc/Makefile.in the actual sed just does nothing, and the system still seems to be stable. but the book explains clearly why we should have the f