Re: e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-21 Thread Chris R. Jones
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:23:50AM +0100, Guy Dalziel wrote: > It is not a defect when the LFS book only currently supports a 32-bit > platform. > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/prologue/hostreqs.html: > "This version of the book builds a 32-bit Linux system and requires an >

Re: e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-21 Thread Guy Dalziel
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 07:47:52PM -0700, Chris R. Jones wrote: > Apologies, I thought lfs-dev was the place for discussing defects in the > development version of the book and lfs-support was for released versions. It is not a defect when the LFS book only currently supports a 32-bit platform. h

Re: e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-20 Thread Chris R. Jones
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:31:27PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Just 500 when less than 20 will do. You will be much more likely to get help > if > you show that you have done some analysis on your own. > > BTW, this should be sent to lfs-support. > >-- Bruce Apologies, I thought lfs-dev w

Re: e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-20 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Chris R. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:28:12PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Chris R. Jones wrote: >> >> Why did you feel compelled to dump an entire log instead of just the >> relevant part? > > Because the parts that are irrelevent to some are of importance to others. > The full log

Re: e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-20 Thread Chris R. Jones
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:28:12PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Chris R. Jones wrote: > > Why did you feel compelled to dump an entire log instead of just the relevant > part? Because the parts that are irrelevent to some are of importance to others. The full log was just 500 lines. > > > Is th

Re: e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-20 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Chris R. Jones wrote: > I'm trying to use the latest book (LFS-BOOK-SVN-20090718.pdf). > I get to chapter 6.20 without any problems, and then when doing "make check" > on e2fsprogs-1.41.8, I see 4 test failures. I'm building on x86_64. > > The tests appear to be getting segmentation faults. Why

e2fsprogs-1.41.8 test failures

2009-07-20 Thread Chris R. Jones
Hi, I'm trying to use the latest book (LFS-BOOK-SVN-20090718.pdf). I get to chapter 6.20 without any problems, and then when doing "make check" on e2fsprogs-1.41.8, I see 4 test failures. I'm building on x86_64. The tests appear to be getting segmentation faults. Is this a known problem? Any w