Re: cryptodev

I'm considering adding an HLFS/scripts, or maybe HLFS/extra, directory to svn, but I'm not sure the consequences of that (I'm not aware of how mirrors would deal with it). A core-system testsuite more comprehensive than paxtest is on my todo list, and it would belong in a trunk subdir (like LFS

Re: cryptodev

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alex, > Anyway, this is altogether too deep a discussion over the adding of a > simple option :-P That option is there since you noticed that first time... :] Anyway, current version can be found at

Re: cryptodev

On Sunday 17 September 2006 23:02, Robert Connolly wrote: > I like it. It works well. Thanks. > > Is it practical to add a --selftest option which checks known values, Seems like something that should go in a seperate script to me, distributed with the digest script: it is something that is only

Re: cryptodev

On Sunday 17 September 2006 22:53, Robert Connolly wrote: > On Sunday 17 September 2006 12:38, Alex Merry wrote: > > I happen to agree with the FSF that programs should not change > > their behaviour because their name has been changed, but that's > > just personal preference. I think there should

Re: cryptodev

I like it. It works well. Thanks. Is it practical to add a --selftest option which checks known values, to make sure it's working? Also, maybe add openssl's version to --version? robert On Sunday 17 September 2006 16:13, Jan Dvořák wrote: > gpgkeys: key A1707213418A684D not found on keyserver >

Re: cryptodev

On Sunday 17 September 2006 12:38, Alex Merry wrote: > On Sunday 17 September 2006 00:00, Robert Connolly wrote: > > I'm not much of an sh scripter. I think a shell script would be > > better than patching Coreutils to use libcrypto. OpenSSL also > > Why? openssl already does what md5sum does, and