Re: config.site questions

2005-11-02 Thread silverspurg
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Its buried fairly deeply in the autoconf documentation. Its always useful to point out these types of things. That's really one of the primary purposes of the whole project. You do speak the truth. I don't remember how I came across config.site but I

Re: config.site questions

2005-11-02 Thread Richard A Downing
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:28:40 -0500 (GMT+5) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Doesn't anyone read the documentation anymore? :) I can understand > needing to teach them about configure... One big problem for new Linux friends, and indeed for new users of most large programs, it the wealth of documenta

Re: config.site questions

2005-11-01 Thread Bruce Dubbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote: > >> I think this would be an extremely useful addition. It teaches the >> user about config.site, and the book already sets other variables at > > > Doesn't anyone read the documentation anymore? :) I can understand > needin

Re: config.site questions

2005-11-01 Thread silverspurg
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote: I think this would be an extremely useful addition. It teaches the user about config.site, and the book already sets other variables at Doesn't anyone read the documentation anymore? :) I can understand needing to teach them about configure... Ste

Re: config.site questions

2005-11-01 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 11/1/05, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/31/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In any case, it might be useful for KDE or possibly Gnome where there > > are related packages, but its usefulness seems to be a bit limited for > > LFS in general. > > I think this would

Re: config.site questions

2005-11-01 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 10/31/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In any case, it might be useful for KDE or possibly Gnome where there > are related packages, but its usefulness seems to be a bit limited for > LFS in general. I think this would be an extremely useful addition. It teaches the user about conf

Re: config.site questions

2005-10-31 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Lennon Cook wrote: > The idea of it is that the options to configure simply cause it to set > some vars. To find the right values for everything, configure parses > the command line options, then parses config.site, then applies it's > defaults. config.site is just a shell script. So, we can set >

Re: config.site questions

2005-10-31 Thread Lennon Cook
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I don't see how PREFIX is set. When I look at configure, thee is the > code: [...] > Secondly, can I use this file to do more than define prefix and the > other directories? For instance, in KDE, I would like to automatically > define --enable-final --disable-debug and > --

config.site questions

2005-10-31 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > >> In any case, are you asking that Cross-LFS investigate the idea of >> using a >> config.site for their build? > > > Yes, for both Cross-LFS and regular LFS. I was not aware of config.site and feel it may be appropriate for some packages