Re: Toolchain Pass 1 Question (6.4 vs dev)

2008-12-17 Thread Reece Dunn
2008/12/16 Jeremy Huntwork : > Reece Dunn wrote: >> Is this an intentional change - for example, as a result of the new >> build method - or is it an accidental result of the merge of Jeremy's >> 64-bit support? That is, does the --target= remove the need for the >> CC= override? > > The use of -B/

Re: Toolchain Pass 1 Question (6.4 vs dev)

2008-12-15 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Reece Dunn wrote: > Is this an intentional change - for example, as a result of the new > build method - or is it an accidental result of the merge of Jeremy's > 64-bit support? That is, does the --target= remove the need for the > CC= override? The use of -B/usr/bin/ in the past was to force the

Toolchain Pass 1 Question (6.4 vs dev)

2008-12-15 Thread Reece Dunn
Hi, I am looking at the 6.4 release and the current development build methods. Comparing Chapter 5.4 (toolchain/binutils - pass 1), 6.4 (and 6.3) have the line: CC="gcc -B/usr/bin/" ../binutils-2.18/configure ... whereas the development build has: ../binutils-2.19/configure --target=$LF