On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:44:47PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
> It is... mostly. We were still thinking of putting in a page that shows
> an entire dependency list, weren't we? That sort of information belongs
> with that Ticket. See this thread:
Yeah. But that might be cause for downgradi
Archaic wrote:
Jeremy, 684 appears to be fulfilled. Can you verify?
It is... mostly. We were still thinking of putting in a page that shows
an entire dependency list, weren't we? That sort of information belongs
with that Ticket. See this thread:
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-ar
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:49:34PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Do you want a patch for 1765? I can do that for you in a few minutes.
Patches are always welcome, even if they are preemptive. :) If you
create one, please attach it to the ticket and make a comment. I can't
really make this commit
Archaic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:25:41PM -0600, Archaic wrote:
>> By the time you go to bed in TX, most, if not all, tickets should be
>> re-classified.
>
> Okay, with one exception, 1765 (the LFS license ticket), I've rearranged them
> as it seemed necessary using the following view:
>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:25:41PM -0600, Archaic wrote:
>
> By the time you go to bed in TX, most, if not all, tickets should be
> re-classified.
Okay, with one exception, 1765 (the LFS license ticket), I've rearranged them
as it seemed necessary using the following view:
http://wiki.linuxfroms
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:13:52PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Overall, progress is great, but I also want a better feel of what is
> coming up.
By the time you go to bed in TX, most, if not all, tickets should be
re-classified.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your oper
Archaic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:52:29PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> It would be useful if one or more LFS editors would go over the list and
>> do an update to help other projects, especially BLFS, plan for what is
>> coming up.
>
> Apparently you haven't checked your lfs-book email
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:52:29PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> It would be useful if one or more LFS editors would go over the list and
> do an update to help other projects, especially BLFS, plan for what is
> coming up.
Apparently you haven't checked your lfs-book email in a bit. ;)
--
Arc
Checking the LFS tickets:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/report/1
I see that there are several (5) tickets that don't have a milestone
attached. One ticket targets udev_update with a 6.2 milestone.
Also note the dates. There is one from 2003, one from 2004 (still
targeted to the future),
