Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 1. The reason for multilib in the first place is to handle packages
> that are pre-compiled for a 32-bit only environment. It only is
> needed on a 64-bit system.
>
> 2. There are very few packages that actually need it. Almost all of
> them proprietary. Open source packa
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I am thinking about closing the subject ticket as WONTFIX.
>
> For the costs in manpower and complexity, I see very little value added
> in this ticket. The only thing then needed is to update the 5th
> paragraph in Section iii.
I completely agree, and note that you've a
I am thinking about closing the subject ticket as WONTFIX.
There are a few reasons for this:
1. The reason for multilib in the first place is to handle packages
that are pre-compiled for a 32-bit only environment. It only is needed
on a 64-bit system.
2. There are very few packages that act
