William Immendorf wrote:
> We should start with only using one configuration file per interface,
Strong disagreement from me on this one.
I *really, really* do not want to give up wake-on-LAN. That requires
two config files per interface, because it requires two services per
interface. (One for
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:53:49 -0500
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> William Immendorf wrote:
>>> * The fact that both DHCPCD and dhclient had very similar
>>> comfiguration files, which made it hard to implement DHCP support in
>>> the backends.
>> I have not looked at dhcp or wir
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:53:49 -0500
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> William Immendorf wrote:
> > * The fact that both DHCPCD and dhclient had very similar
> > comfiguration files, which made it hard to implement DHCP support in
> > the backends.
>
> I have not looked at dhcp or wireless-tools with respect t
William Immendorf wrote:
> A year or so ago, I was working on getting Gnome-system-tools to
> support BLFS (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624299).
> While I was doing that, I ran into roadblocks when trying to implement
> the network functions. They were:
>
> * The configuration files
A year or so ago, I was working on getting Gnome-system-tools to
support BLFS (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624299).
While I was doing that, I ran into roadblocks when trying to implement
the network functions. They were:
* The configuration files. Instead of a single file, there wer
