Re: svn bootscript regression

2011-06-07 Thread Nathan Coulson
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Archaic wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:32:56PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: >>> It was done intentionally. I was not aware that anyone had ever used a >>> file named ifconfig.interface and this was not documented anywhere. I >>> removed it becau

Re: svn bootscript regression

2011-06-07 Thread Bruce Dubbs
DJ Lucas wrote: > On 06/07/2011 11:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> You are right. That's the way I remember it too. I never liked it >> though. A single file that is edited would be better for LFS. >> >> The system is designed so a distribution package manager can just drop >> in files. That's eas

Re: svn bootscript regression

2011-06-07 Thread DJ Lucas
On 06/07/2011 11:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > You are right. That's the way I remember it too. I never liked it > though. A single file that is edited would be better for LFS. > > The system is designed so a distribution package manager can just drop > in files. That's easier for a distro, but h

Re: svn bootscript regression

2011-06-07 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Archaic wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:32:56PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: >> It was done intentionally. I was not aware that anyone had ever used a >> file named ifconfig.interface and this was not documented anywhere. I >> removed it because it simply because it was one more test case in ifup

Re: svn bootscript regression

2011-06-07 Thread Archaic
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:32:56PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: > It was done intentionally. I was not aware that anyone had ever used a > file named ifconfig.interface and this was not documented anywhere. I > removed it because it simply because it was one more test case in ifup > and ifdown. I coul

Re: svn bootscript regression

2011-06-07 Thread Nathan Coulson
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: > On 06/07/2011 06:20 PM, Archaic wrote: >> Network interface configuration used to be either a file or a directory >> named ifconfig.. With the latest lsb-compliant bootscripts, >> it seems that the bootscript won't accept a file and neither will if

Re: svn bootscript regression

2011-06-07 Thread DJ Lucas
On 06/07/2011 06:20 PM, Archaic wrote: > Network interface configuration used to be either a file or a directory > named ifconfig.. With the latest lsb-compliant bootscripts, > it seems that the bootscript won't accept a file and neither will ifup > unless using -c. Is this intentional? It was done