On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:32:53PM +0100, Kev Buckley wrote:
>
> Hope that makes sense.
Everything you said made perfect sense. However, all the sources
unpacked are over 1 GB. Considering how LFS only needs 1.3 GB to build,
your method would basically double the required partition space and
woul
>
> This brought up a philosophical debate in my mind. If the book mentions
> moving the sources, but then proceeds to move them to a directory where
> only root can write, ISTM that this can be mis-interpreted as "you have
> to download sources as root to be able to save them". If someone has to
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:04:09PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> Sorry, I only meant that the last paragraph (the two lines beneath the
> "note" box should be removed. The rest could/should be reworded as per
> your suggestions.
Will do.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security
Archaic wrote:
Well then now we are left with another question. If we remove all this
stuff we are left with only a revised chroot command.
Sorry, I only meant that the last paragraph (the two lines beneath the
"note" box should be removed. The rest could/should be reworded as per
your sugg
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:10:14PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> Right, like Tushar and Andrew said I don't think we should be giving
> advice/suggestions on such trivial matters as this. Let's just get rid
> of the entire paragraph.
>
> I think all of these are suitable for the 6.1 branch
Archaic wrote:
I suggest:
The reason for this is that the programs in /tools are no longer needed.
Since they are no longer needed you can delete the /tools directory if
so desired or tar it up and keep it to build another final system.
Look good to me.
I suggest:
Removing /tools will also
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
IMO, the entire paragraph should go. LFS should not be recommending
where the source files be downloaded initially nor should it suggest
where the source files should be moved finally.
I agree. It's impractical to put them somewhere that only root can write to.
Users s
On 6/7/05, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> from
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.html
> -snip-
>
> The packages and patches stored in /sources can also be moved to a
> more usual location, such as /usr/src/packages. The entire directory can
>
Archaic wrote these words on 06/07/05 23:55 CST:
> Basically rewording nearly an entire page due to the fact that it is
> both hand-holding and confusing at the same time. The reason I call it
> hand-holding is that even a *suggestion* in the book (without any other
> counter-suggestions) will lea
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Is there any way you can perhaps make a short paragraph of what
> you are suggesting? I read your original email earlier today, but
> it was simply too much to think about. I got lost.
Basically rewording nearly an entire page du
Archaic wrote these words on 06/07/05 23:30 CST:
> Suggestions? Comments? Feedback is requested, please.
Is there any way you can perhaps make a short paragraph of what
you are suggesting? I read your original email earlier today, but
it was simply too much to think about. I got lost.
So, I just
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:08:10PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> My suggestion is to leave that part completely out of chapter 6 and put
> it in as an appendix to the book. It is extremely confusing after you
> do that and then go to chapter 7.
Did you read my changes? If so please re-repl
El Martes, 7 de Junio de 2005 19:56, Archaic escribió:
> from
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/testing/chapter06/revisedchroot.ht
>ml
The redaction changes look fine to me.
>
> This brought up a philosophical debate in my mind. If the book mentions
> moving the sources, but then proceed
13 matches
Mail list logo
