Re: cross-lfs: small possible purity-issue with libgcc_s

2005-05-02 Thread Ryan Oliver
Erik-Jan wrote: - sed/patch the source (gcc/gcc.c) so the hard-codes /usr/lib gets replaced by /tools/lib: sed -i "/standard_exec_prefix_/s%/usr%/tools%g" gcc/gcc.c My preference would be the sed/patch, because it removes all the hardcoded host-dirs from gcc's search-path. For consistency, make

Re: cross-lfs: small possible purity-issue with libgcc_s

2005-05-01 Thread Ryan . Oliver
Erik-Jan wrote: Yo Erik-Jan :-) Good to hear from you again ;-) >As you can see, in the first case it uses libgcc_s.so from the host, >in >the second case it uses the newly build libgcc_s.so. Good catch... guess I really should do some more host=target builds from ix86... Will check what

Re: cross-lfs: small possible purity-issue with libgcc_s

2005-05-01 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Erik-Jan wrote: This is the output: attempt to open /home/lfs/cross-tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/libgcc_s.so failed attempt to open /home/lfs/cross-tools/bin/../lib/gcc/libgcc_s.so failed attempt to open /cross-tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/libgcc_s.so failed attempt to o