On 2/15/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/15/06, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dan Nicholson wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that rather than using the compiled in LIB_PATH that we make
> > > use of in Ch. 5 to repoint the linker to where we want, the default
> > > will be
On 2/15/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Where do you get the HJL releases from?
Never mind.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above informa
On 2/15/06, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > It seems that rather than using the compiled in LIB_PATH that we make
> > use of in Ch. 5 to repoint the linker to where we want, the default
> > will be that the paths in /etc/ld.so.conf will be preferred before
> > t
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> It appears that binutils ld will be changing its search behavior to
> more closely follow ld.so. See this post:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00127.html
>
> It seems that rather than using the compiled in LIB_PATH that we make
> use of in Ch. 5 to r
On 2/15/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It appears that binutils ld will be changing its search behavior to
> more closely follow ld.so. See this post:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00127.html
By the way, this has been checked into HEAD:
http://sou