On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 08:06:09PM +0200, jp wrote:
> I used binutils-2.19.51, with this build. Tests are just fine with it. By the
Thanks for the heads-up, I'll grab the snapshot and use that. It sounds like
binutils is heading in the right direction.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list
Le dimanche 14 juin 2009 18:02:41, Guy Dalziel a écrit :
> Whenever I ran the binutils testsuite it would always end with an error,
> the attached patch fixes this and allows the binutils testsuite to
> finish properly. Credit for this goes to Jan Kratochvil at nabble.com.
Hey,
I used binutils-2.
Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
>> I noticed -O3 causes tests to fail, too, with binutils-2.17.
>>
> Does "make CFLAGS= check" fix this case also?
>
It's the same problem as with -Os, and yes, that fixes it.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ
Robert Connolly wrote:
I noticed -O3 causes tests to fail, too, with binutils-2.17.
Does "make CFLAGS= check" fix this case also?
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information
I noticed -O3 causes tests to fail, too, with binutils-2.17.
robert
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 00:03, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if the user includes "-Os" in his CFLAGS, binutils tests in LFS-6.2 will
> show 21 failures ("visibility" and "shared" tests).
pgptyyKHU2YsY.pgp
Desc
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:03:16AM +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> if the user includes "-Os" in his CFLAGS, binutils tests in LFS-6.2 will
> show 21 failures ("visibility" and "shared" tests). 18 of them don't
> show up if the "binutils-2.17-ppc64_fix_testsuite-1.patch" testsuite fix
..
