Re: a bug in the perl patch

2011-06-27 Thread Gilles Espinasse
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Dubbs" To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:32 PM Subject: Re: a bug in the perl patch > Matthew Burgess wrote: > > On 27/06/2011 02:34, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > &g

Re: a bug in the perl patch

2011-06-27 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: > On 27/06/2011 02:34, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I also see a change in >> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/browser/trunk/perl/perl-5.10.1-libc-1.patch >> by Matt. >> >> I'll be glad to change this if it was an inadvertent change, but I'd >> like to confirm that first.

Re: a bug in the perl patch

2011-06-27 Thread Matthew Burgess
On 27/06/2011 02:34, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I also see a change in > http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/browser/trunk/perl/perl-5.10.1-libc-1.patch > by Matt. > > I'll be glad to change this if it was an inadvertent change, but I'd > like to confirm that first. > > Matt? That definitely looks

Re: a bug in the perl patch

2011-06-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:13:18 -0500 >> Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Andrew Benton wrote: >>> The current patch tests if ${prefix}/lib/libc.so.6 exists and then >>> it gets the version of libc from /lib/libc.so.6, the one installed >>> on the host... > >> I'm not sure why th

Re: a bug in the perl patch

2011-06-26 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
>On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:13:18 -0500 >Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Andrew Benton wrote: > > The current patch tests if ${prefix}/lib/libc.so.6 exists and then > > it gets the version of libc from /lib/libc.so.6, the one installed > > on the host... > I'm not sure why the change was made in 2008, but it h

Re: a bug in the perl patch

2011-06-26 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Andrew Benton wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:45:42 -0500 > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: >>> There is a bug in the newly submitted patch for perl. >> I haven't looked at what the patch is doing in detail, but the only >> difference between what is currently in the book and la

Re: a bug in the perl patch

2011-06-26 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:45:42 -0500 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > > There is a bug in the newly submitted patch for perl. > > I haven't looked at what the patch is doing in detail, but the only > difference between what is currently in the book and latest patch I just > commit

Re: a bug in the perl patch

2011-06-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > There is a bug in the newly submitted patch for perl. I haven't looked at what the patch is doing in detail, but the only difference between what is currently in the book and latest patch I just committed are line numbers. The change you are referring to last was in p