Greg Schafer wrote:
> Those binutils headers are utterly useless. Nothing needs them.
Woops. To clarify, I meant to add "... at this early stage of the build.".
They can, of course, be useful in a completed system.
Regards
Greg
--
http://www.diy-linux.org/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mail
M.Canales.es wrote:
> Are the headers files already sanitized inside the kernel tree or are they
> generated on-the-fly by "make headers-install" command ?
On the fly.
> If the last, the tools used to generate the headers files (the ones in /tools
> for the first build, but the ones in /{bin,u
El Miércoles, 6 de Diciembre de 2006 12:10, Greg Schafer escribió:
> IMHO there is little point in reinstalling the kernel headers during
> subsequent ICA iterations. I've never done it. After all, they are not
> binary, they are just ascii text.
Are the headers files already sanitized inside the
M.Canales.es wrote:
> Doing yesterday a SVN-20061201 build to test current ICA/farce support in
> jhalfs I found that the first iterative build of Glibc fails at the configure
> stage with that:
> As can be seen, when finished the system build both /usr/include/limits.h
> and /usr/include/as
