On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 01:13:31AM +0200, M.Canales.es wrote:
>
> Revising the webcvs I noticed that the historial is already loss in the
> cross-lfs branch due the big changes in the book structure.
That can be folded back in. For instance, every file that is in the same
location within the boo
El Sábado, 14 de Mayo de 2005 00:16, Archaic escribió:
> As we discussed on IRC, it can still be done without any historical
> loss, but it will require a lot of manual fiddling. However, as this is
> a one time thing, I think we'd be shooting ourselves in the foot
> researching a way to automate
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:24:46PM -0700, Jim Gifford wrote:
>
> Tried that via svk, bombed everytime. I talked to the on
> irc.freenode.net #svn, they said if the structure was the same it
> wouldn't be an issue, but we made a lot of changes to lfs to multi-arch
> and multi-arch to cross-lfs.
M.Canales.es wrote:
El Viernes, 13 de Mayo de 2005 00:07, Matthew Burgess escribió:
Yeah, I thought as much. I just don't want those changes getting lost,
and I'm not quite sure how we're going to migrate the cross-lfs stuff to
trunk when we get to that stage.
I think that the migration co
El Viernes, 13 de Mayo de 2005 00:07, Matthew Burgess escribió:
> Yeah, I thought as much. I just don't want those changes getting lost,
> and I'm not quite sure how we're going to migrate the cross-lfs stuff to
> trunk when we get to that stage.
I think that the migration could be done without
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
It won't work, Matt the structure is to different. The same issue we
had with the multi-arch book, I'll have to do it manually.
Yeah, I thought as much. I just don't want those changes getting
lost, and I'm not quite sure how we're going to migrate the
Jim Gifford wrote:
It won't work, Matt the structure is to different. The same issue we had
with the multi-arch book, I'll have to do it manually.
Yeah, I thought as much. I just don't want those changes getting lost,
and I'm not quite sure how we're going to migrate the cross-lfs stuff to
trun
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
Peter and Tony,
I would appreciate it if you guys would do the same thing for the
new cross-lfs book, that way it's correct now instead of later.
Jim, would you mind merging r5317 and r5318 to the cross-lfs branch
please? I'm about to merge to testin
Jim Gifford wrote:
Peter and Tony,
I would appreciate it if you guys would do the same thing for the new
cross-lfs book, that way it's correct now instead of later.
Jim, would you mind merging r5317 and r5318 to the cross-lfs branch
please? I'm about to merge to testing now.
Cheers,
Matt.
--
