Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> It is used in documentation only(info, html, ps). I don't see why we
> can't go ahead and patch or sed the changes. I prefer seds for simple
> fixes because they tell the user exactly what is being changed in the book.
Thanks Bruce, applied in r9201. I think the sed expr
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/readline/readline-6.1-patches/readline61-002
> fixes an issue whereby the version numbers didn't get bumped in readline.h.
>
> I've done some quick greps on the source but I can't find where this is
> actually used (aside from it simply be
