Re: Patch to fix BZ #1597

2005-08-04 Thread Archaic
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:50:36PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > It's the best we've got. One of two things has to happen to close the > bug. Run the test suite the only way we can (which, by the way, is a > very good indication that the package builds in the manner intended by > the author), o

Re: Patch to fix BZ #1597

2005-08-04 Thread Randy McMurchy
Archaic wrote these words on 08/04/05 18:30 CST: > Perhaps I'm being to anal about it, but I see little to no value in > building binaries, testing them, then wiping them and building new > binaries. IOW, it doesn't test anything other than the _possibility_ > that the next binaries _might_ be goo

Re: Patch to fix BZ #1597

2005-08-04 Thread Archaic
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 01:31:56PM -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote: > > By messed up I meant that if you use the normal way of running tests: >./configure --prefix=/usr && >make && >make -k check || true && >make install > > The make check will run configure again (twice actually) a

Re: Patch to fix BZ #1597

2005-08-04 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 8/4/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Incidentally, in Tush's original report he mentioned that "Additionally, > running make check messes up the built executables". 2 questions > related to that then: > > 1. What exactly is "messed up" about them? and > 2. Are they similarly

Re: Patch to fix BZ #1597

2005-08-04 Thread Randy McMurchy
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/04/05 13:11 CST: > Well, I thought about that, but because the version number of the > testsuite tarball and the source tarball are the same (unlike the > Bash tarball and the Bash Docs tarball) and the fact they are > downloaded from the same directory (poin

Re: Patch to fix BZ #1597

2005-08-04 Thread Randy McMurchy
Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 08/04/05 13:01 CST: > Randy McMurchy wrote: > >>+If you wish to run the test suite for Module-Init-Tools, download the >>+separate tarball and unpack it along with the source tarball. > > What tarball? Now, as it's optional, do we link to it from > chapter03

Re: Patch to fix BZ #1597

2005-08-04 Thread Matthew Burgess
Randy McMurchy wrote: Hi all, Attached is a patch which can be applied to trunk (and other branches as well, I think) which will provide instructions to run the Module Init Tools test suite and fix BZ #1597. Thanks a lot. It seems to address my concerns nicely! +If you wish to run the test s