Re: Minor typo or not

2006-08-01 Thread Randy McMurchy
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 08/01/06 22:46 CST: > Randy, I thought you wanted Bruce to use the upstream patches earlier today? It was determined that he would not, so, the least that could happen is the LFS-created patch conforms to the well-established guidelines set forth by the patches

Re: Minor typo or not

2006-08-01 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 8/1/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/01/06 20:36 CST: > Its not a bug, its an educational feature. :) Unfortunately, your "educational feature" is in conflict with the well-established guidelines of the patches project. Please review the guid

Re: Minor typo or not

2006-08-01 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/01/06 20:36 CST: > Its not a bug, its an educational feature. :) Unfortunately, your "educational feature" is in conflict with the well-established guidelines of the patches project. Please review the guidelines and create a new patch. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bo

Re: Minor typo or not

2006-08-01 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Peter Ennis wrote: > 6.2-pre3 > > 6.13.1. Installation of Berkeley DB > > Patch the package to eliminate potential trap events: > > patch -Np0 -i ../db-4.4.20-trap-1.patch > > NOTE: All other patches in the book use -Np1 > I read the man page and it does not clarify > the difference for me. > T