On 09/19/2009 11:29 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been investigating the Linux Standards Base core specification.
>
> http://dev.linux-foundation.org/betaspecs/booksets/LSB-Core-IA32/LSB-Core-IA32.html#REQUIREMENTS
>
> 1. Looking at the required libraries, I see that libncurses.so.5 is required.
>
James Robertson wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> I've been investigating the Linux Standards Base core specification.
>>>
>>> 3. For the full spec, we also need libpam. Does this LSB core requirement
>>> justify promoting PAM from BLFS to LFS?
>>>
>> Upon fur
2009/9/19 Bruce Dubbs :
> I've been investigating the Linux Standards Base core specification.
>
> http://dev.linux-foundation.org/betaspecs/booksets/LSB-Core-IA32/LSB-Core-IA32.html#REQUIREMENTS
>
> 1. Looking at the required libraries, I see that libncurses.so.5 is required.
> We have libncurses
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been investigating the Linux Standards Base core specification.
>
> http://dev.linux-foundation.org/betaspecs/booksets/LSB-Core-IA32/LSB-Core-IA32.html#REQUIREMENTS
>
> 3. For the full spec, we also need libpam. Does this LSB core requirement
> justify promoting PAM fro
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> I've been investigating the Linux Standards Base core specification.
>>
>> 3. For the full spec, we also need libpam. Does this LSB core requirement
>> justify promoting PAM from BLFS to LFS?
>>
>
> Upon further review, the answer to this
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been investigating the Linux Standards Base core specification.
> 3. For the full spec, we also need libpam. Does this LSB core requirement
> justify promoting PAM from BLFS to LFS?
Upon further review, the answer to this should be no. I've looked at the
Commands an
