Re: LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: M.Canales.es wrote: UTF-8 .- Not yet in the official LFS repository (when will be added?), but is the most problematic one. Alexander, if you send to me a patch against current trunk, I will try to create an updated patch against the

Re: LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
M.Canales.es wrote: UTF-8 .- Not yet in the official LFS repository (when will be added?), but is the most problematic one. Alexander, if you send to me a patch against current trunk, I will try to create an updated patch against the indented trunk. This will tak

Re: LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread Matthew Burgess
Randy McMurchy wrote: M.Canales.es wrote these words on 11/11/05 12:30 CST: I don't remember any discussion about the "alphabetical merge". Is this something that is deemed so trivial that it isn't worthy of community discussion before implementation? The 'svn merge' command is of course tri

Re: LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread M.Canales.es
El Viernes, 11 de Noviembre de 2005 19:41, Randy McMurchy escribió: > M.Canales.es wrote these words on 11/11/05 12:30 CST: > I don't remember any discussion about the "alphabetical merge". Is > this something that is deemed so trivial that it isn't worthy of > community discussion before implemen

Re: LFS Book indention

2005-11-11 Thread Randy McMurchy
M.Canales.es wrote these words on 11/11/05 12:30 CST: > In resume, can I to start indenting LFS-SVN?, or should to wait until after > 6.1.1 release and the alphabetical merge? I don't remember any discussion about the "alphabetical merge". Is this something that is deemed so trivial that it isn'