Andrew Benton wrote:
I used gcc-4.0.2 and didn't apply any patches to glibc.
Roland McGrath is readying 2.3.6. See
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2005-10/msg00023.html. It too
should be able to handle gcc-4.0.2 just fine. No, it's not as bleeding
edge as CVS HEAD, but some of us
DJ Lucas wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
Hello people,
I just updated my copy of glibc-cvs and for the first time in ages it
passed all the tests. I don't remember the last time it passed all the
tests. For the last couple of weeks there's been a problem with perl
hanging when I ran configure, that'
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Hello people,
> I just updated my copy of glibc-cvs and for the first time in ages it
> passed all the tests. I don't remember the last time it passed all the
> tests. For the last couple of weeks there's been a problem with perl
> hanging when I ran configure, that's fixed t
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Andrew Benton wrote:
Hello people,
I just updated my copy of glibc-cvs and for the first time in ages it passed
all the tests. I don't remember the last time it passed all the tests. For
Party at Andrew's house!
Steven
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
