Re: GCC4 book needs to be updated

2005-08-12 Thread Chris Staub
Matthew Burgess wrote: Chris Staub wrote: and in section 5.6. Glibc-2.3.5 it mentions kernel 2.6.11 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/gcc4/chapter05/glibc.html It also says that in the development book. Should that be "2.6.11.x or later"? Yep, this as with many other things are o

Re: GCC4 book needs to be updated

2005-08-12 Thread Matthew Burgess
Chris Staub wrote: and in section 5.6. Glibc-2.3.5 it mentions kernel 2.6.11 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/gcc4/chapter05/glibc.html It also says that in the development book. Should that be "2.6.11.x or later"? Yep, this as with many other things are on that TODO list I spoke o

Re: GCC4 book needs to be updated

2005-08-12 Thread Chris Staub
Andrew Benton wrote: Chris Staub wrote: The GCC4 book hasn't been touched in over a week, and in that time there have been several changes to the development trunk that haven't been applied to GCC4. This includes... 1. Update of Vim security patch 2. Suggestion to add cracklib to Shadow inst

Re: GCC4 book needs to be updated

2005-08-12 Thread Andrew Benton
Chris Staub wrote: The GCC4 book hasn't been touched in over a week, and in that time there have been several changes to the development trunk that haven't been applied to GCC4. This includes... 1. Update of Vim security patch 2. Suggestion to add cracklib to Shadow installation 3. text change

Re: GCC4 book needs to be updated

2005-08-12 Thread Randy McMurchy
Chris Staub wrote these words on 08/12/05 09:39 CST: > The GCC4 book hasn't been touched in over a week, and in that time there > have been several changes to the development trunk that haven't been > applied to GCC4. This includes... There is only one guy working on this branch and he has admit