Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> What x86 userspace?
Download the x86 (not x86_64) Lenny minimal installation CD. Install
from it, then run the following commands:
aptitude install gawk m4 bison flex texinfo build-essential subversion
linux-image-2.6-amd64 libc6-dev-amd64 gcc-4.1-multilib
aptitude purg
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Then the main system will be 32-bit, but there will be a 64-bit kernel
> and enough 64-bit libraries to run simple 64-bit applications. And the
> compiler accepts the "-m64" switch, so that you can even compile them.
Thanks, I was wondering if you did something diffe
(resending from a different mail account - USU seems to have problems)
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> What x86 userspace?
Download the x86 (not x86_64) Lenny minimal installation CD. Install
from it, then run the following commands:
aptitude install gawk m4 bison flex texinfo build-essential subversi
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> I also started a build on Ubuntu Dapper (don't have Feisty installed
> anywhere just now) just to see how that would go. I've already gotten
> past the point of error on the Debian system and it's still moving forward.
GCC pass 2 and still moving. Something's wonky with
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am afraid that LFS-6.3 will be obsolete even before release. Details
> follow.
>
> I have tried to build the x86_64 LiveCD from Debian Lenny (x86
> userspace, but with 64-bit kernel, 64-bit capable compiler, and with
> 64-bit libs installed). This fa
I wrote:
> I am afraid that LFS-6.3 will be obsolete even before release.
Sorry for the panic. The issue is specific to x86_64.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I wrote:
> The new binutils recognize Debian's 64-bit glibc just fine. Currently
> building gcc-4.1.2.
>
It failed (even though I used "gcc -m64" where needed). So I guess that
this host is just too weird to start from.
For your curious minds, here is the error:
./xgcc -B./ -B/tools/x86_64-
I wrote:
> So IMHO, Binutils should be upgraded to the HJL version at least on x86_64.
>
> Currently I am downloading the new binutils from
> http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/binutils-2.17.50.0.18.tar.bz2.
> I will report my furter progress here.
>
>
The new binutils recognize De
